Stability of fruit yield in watermelon genotypes tested in multiple US environments

被引:0
|
作者
Dia, M. [1 ]
Wehner, T. C. [1 ]
Hassell, R. [2 ]
Price, D. S. [3 ]
Boyhan, G. E. [4 ]
Olson, S. [5 ]
King, S. [6 ]
Davis, A. R. [7 ]
Tolla, G. E. [8 ]
Bernier, J. [8 ]
Juarez, B.
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Hort Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Coastal Res & Educ Ctr, Charleston, SC 29414 USA
[3] Georgia Cty Extens, Cordele, GA 31015 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[5] Univ Florida, North Florida REC, Quincy, FL 32351 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hort Sci, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
[7] USDA ARS, Lane, OK 74555 USA
[8] Monsanto Seminis Veg Seeds, Woodland, CA 95695 USA
关键词
Watermelon; GxE interaction; yield stability; GRAIN-YIELD; IMPROVEMENT; TRIALS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thumb.] Matsum & Nakai) is a valuable crop grown throughout southern and western United States (US). We were interested in identifying watermelon cultivars having high stability for fruit yield and yield components over diverse environments in the US. A set of 40 genotypes was tested over 3 years (2009, 2010, and 2011) at 8 locations across the southern US in replicated, multi-harvest trials. Yield traits were summed over harvests, and measured as marketable yield, fruit count, % cull fruit, % early fruit, and fruit size. The influences of years and locations on yield performance and genotypes with high stability for yield were identified. Four genotypes including, 'Fiesta F1', 'Stars-N-Stripes F1', 'Stone Mountain' and 'Calhoun Gray' had a high trait mean performance and high phenotypic stability. These four stable genotypes had high marketable yield, average fruit count, low % cull fruit, above average early yield, and medium fruit size. Inbreds 'Big Crimson' and 'Legacy' would be good lines for breeding for high yield and stability.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 88
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting
    Alexopoulos, Alexios A.
    Kondylis, Angelos
    Passam, Harold C.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 5 (01): : 178 - 179
  • [12] WATERMELON TRANSPLANT AGE - INFLUENCE ON FRUIT YIELD
    VAVRINA, CS
    OLSON, S
    CORNELL, JA
    HORTSCIENCE, 1993, 28 (08) : 789 - 790
  • [13] Effects of watermelon grafting on fruit yield and quality
    不详
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (03) : 871 - 871
  • [14] Stability of Yield and Yield Components of Grafted Tomato in Multiple Environments in Texas
    Djidonou, Desire
    Leskovar, Daniel I.
    Joshi, Madhumita
    Jifon, John
    Avila, Carlos A.
    Masabni, Joseph G.
    Wallace, Russell W.
    Crosby, Kevin
    HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S169 - S170
  • [15] AMMONIUM REDUCES GROWTH, FRUIT YIELD AND FRUIT-QUALITY OF WATERMELON
    SIMONNE, EH
    MILLS, HA
    SMITTLE, DA
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1992, 15 (12) : 2727 - 2741
  • [16] Agronomic Performance and Yield Stability of Elite White Guinea Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Genotypes Grown in Multiple Environments in Nigeria
    Olatunji, Alice Adenike
    Gana, Andrew Saba
    Tolorunse, Kehinde D.
    Agre, Paterne A.
    Adebola, Patrick
    Asfaw, Asrat
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [17] Yield stability differences among sweetpotato genotypes under field and controlled environments
    David, PP
    Bonsi, CK
    Mortley, DG
    Trotman, AA
    TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1998, 75 (1-2): : 204 - 207
  • [18] L-Citrulline Levels in Watermelon Cultigens Tested in Two Environments
    Davis, Angela R.
    Webber, Charles L., III
    Fish, Wayne W.
    Wehner, Todd C.
    King, Stephen
    Perkins-Veazie, Penelope
    HORTSCIENCE, 2011, 46 (12) : 1572 - 1575
  • [19] Quantitative Analysis of Generations for Inheritance of Fruit Yield in Watermelon
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Wehner, Todd C.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2013, 48 (07) : 844 - 847
  • [20] Influence of rootstocks on yield and fruit characteristics and quality of watermelon
    Ahmet Turhan
    Nese Ozmen
    Hayrettin Kuscu
    Mehmet Sitki Serbeci
    Vedat Seniz
    Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2012, 53 : 336 - 341