An ontology modelling perspective on business reporting

被引:30
|
作者
Spies, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] LMU Univ Munich, Inst Informat, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Digital Enterprise Res Inst, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Enterprise information integration and interoperability; Languages for conceptual modelling; Ontological approaches to content and knowledge management; Ontology-based software engineering for enterprise solutions; Domain engineering;
D O I
10.1016/j.is.2008.12.003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we discuss the motivation and the fundamentals of an ontology representation of business reporting data and metadata structures as defined in the eXtensible business reporting language (XBRL) standard. The core motivation for an ontology representation is the enhanced potential for integrated analytic applications that build on quantitative reporting data combined with structured and unstructured data from additional sources. Applications of this kind will enable significant enhancements in regulatory compliance management, as they enable business analytics combined with inference engines for statistical, but also for logical inferences. In order to define a suitable ontology representation of business reporting language structures, an analysis of the logical principles of the reporting metadata taxonomies and further classification systems is presented. Based on this analysis, a representation of the generally accepted accounting principles taxonomies in XBRL by an ontology provided in the web ontology language (OWL) is proposed. An additional advantage of this representation is its compliance with the recent ontology definition metamodel (ODM) standard issued by OMG. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 416
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Short Comparison of Business Process Modelling Methods under the Perspective of Structure and Behaviour
    Sinz, Elmar J.
    [J]. ENTERPRISE MODELLING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 13 : 63 - 68
  • [42] ITS Domain Modelling with Ontology
    Martin, Brent
    Mitrovic, Antonija
    Suraweera, Pramuditha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2008, 14 (17) : 2758 - 2776
  • [43] Modelling ontology evaluation and validation
    Gangemi, Aldo
    Catenacci, Carola
    Ciaramita, Massimiliano
    Lehmann, Jos
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB: RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4011 : 140 - 154
  • [44] Business modelling is not process modelling
    Gordijn, Jaap
    Akkermans, Hans
    Van Vliet, Hans
    [J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2000, 1921 : 40 - 51
  • [45] Business modelling is not process modelling
    Gordijn, J
    Akkermans, H
    Van Vliet, H
    [J]. CONCEPTUAL MODELING FOR E-BUSINESS AND THE WEB, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 1921 : 40 - 51
  • [46] Reporting 4.0: Business Reporting for the Age of Mass Customization
    Alles, Michael G.
    Dai, Jun
    Vasarhelyi, Miklos A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN ACCOUNTING, 2021, 18 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [47] Extensible Business Reporting Language Technology Adoption and Diffusion-A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Perspective
    Pan, Ding
    Ji, Yali
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (04):
  • [48] MIRO: guidelines for minimum information for the reporting of an ontology
    Matentzoglu, Nicolas
    Malone, James
    Mungall, Chris
    Stevens, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SEMANTICS, 2018, 9
  • [49] MIRO: guidelines for minimum information for the reporting of an ontology
    Nicolas Matentzoglu
    James Malone
    Chris Mungall
    Robert Stevens
    [J]. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 9
  • [50] An intellectual capital ontology in an integrated reporting context
    Stacchezzini, Riccardo
    Florio, Cristina
    Sproviero, Alice Francesca
    Corbella, Silvano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2019, 20 (01) : 83 - 99