Chinese Overseas Investment Policy: Implications for Climate Change
被引:30
|
作者:
Gallagher, Kelly Sims
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tufts Univ, Fletcher Sch, Energy & Environm Policy, Medford, MA 02155 USA
Tufts Univ, Fletcher Sch, Climate Policy Lab, Medford, MA 02155 USATufts Univ, Fletcher Sch, Energy & Environm Policy, Medford, MA 02155 USA
Gallagher, Kelly Sims
[1
,2
]
Qi, Qi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tufts Univ, Climate Policy Lab, Medford, MA 02155 USA
Tufts Univ, Econ & Publ Policy, Medford, MA 02155 USATufts Univ, Fletcher Sch, Energy & Environm Policy, Medford, MA 02155 USA
Qi, Qi
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Tufts Univ, Fletcher Sch, Energy & Environm Policy, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Fletcher Sch, Climate Policy Lab, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Climate Policy Lab, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Econ & Publ Policy, Medford, MA 02155 USA
President Xi Jinping launched the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013. In total capital, China is now the largest investor in least-developed countries and in developing Asia, and the fifth-largest investor in Africa. Motivated by concerns about the climate change consequences of China's overseas investments, this paper identifies and evaluates Chinese policies governing China's overseas investments and analyzes how those policies influence environmental outcomes in recipient countries. Policies governing domestic investments are analyzed in order to clarify inconsistencies between domestic and overseas policies. Key findings are that the Chinese government's environmental policies governing domestic investments are more stringent than those governing overseas investments. Chinese environmental overseas investment policies are mostly voluntary in nature so long as firms comply with host country regulations. Disclosure and transparency of information about China's investments is opaque. Even if there is a failure to comply with host country regulations, there do not appear to be serious enforcement consequences. Finally, China encourages overseas investments in clean energy as well as exploration and development of higher carbon industries and fails to specifically restrict or prohibit investment in carbon-intensive and fossil fuel industries in its overseas investments, revealing a discrepancy between policy for domestic and overseas investment.