Evaluation and comparison of the earth observing sensors in land cover/land use studies using machine learning algorithms

被引:33
|
作者
Prasad, Pankaj [1 ,3 ]
Loveson, Victor Joseph [1 ]
Chandra, Priyankar [2 ]
Kotha, Mahender [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIR Natl Inst Oceanog, Geol Oceanog Div, Panaji 403004, Goa, India
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Sci, Dept Geog, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Goa Univ, Sch Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Taleigao 403001, Goa, India
关键词
Land cover; land use; Mapping; Wetland; Remote sensing; Machine learning; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; DECISION TREES; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; RANDOM FOREST; SWIR BAND; SENTINEL-2; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101522
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The rapid transformation of land cover/land use (LCLU) is a strong indication of global environmental change. In order to monitor LCLU through maps, a significant dataset and robust technique are necessary. Thus, the primary objective of the current research is to evaluate and compare the efficiency of several notable satellite sensors including Landsat-8 (L-8), Sentinel-2 (S-2), Sentinel-1 (S-1), combined Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 (S-1-2), LISS III (L-3), and LISS IV (L-4) for LCLU mapping applying random forest (RF), logit boost (LB), stochastic gradient boosting (SGB), artificial neural network (ANN), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) models. For this purpose, 300 samples for each of the six LCLU classes have been selected based on field survey and high resolution Cartosat-3 images. The classification accuracy namely producer accuracy (PA), user accuracy (UA), overall accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient have been calculated from the confusion matrix of the applied models. This results show the highest accuracy has been derived from the integration of S-1-2 datasets followed by S-2, L-8, L-3, L-4, and S1. On the other hand, LB model is the most consistent and efficient in comparison with other models for all the datasets. Regarding importance of variable, SWIR band is repeatedly the most crucial factor while blue band is the least significant variable. From this comparative assessment of sensors, it has been found that high spatial and spectral resolutions along with combination of satellite datasets are required to get better accuracy rather than only high spatial resolution in regional scale mapping. The present study strongly advocates the use of combined S-1-2 data together with the application of LB model for LCLU classification.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Three Machine Learning Algorithms Using Google Earth Engine for Land Use Land Cover Classification
    Zhao, Zhewen
    Islam, Fakhrul
    Waseem, Liaqat Ali
    Tariq, Aqil
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Ul Islam, Ijaz
    Bibi, Tehmina
    Rehman, Nazir Ur
    Ahmad, Waqar
    Aslam, Rana Waqar
    Raza, Danish
    Hatamleh, Wesam Atef
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 92 : 129 - 137
  • [2] Land use and land cover classification using machine learning algorithms in google earth engine
    Arpitha, M.
    Ahmed, S. A.
    Harishnaika, N.
    [J]. EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (04) : 3057 - 3073
  • [3] Land use and land cover classification using machine learning algorithms in google earth engine
    Arpitha M
    S A Ahmed
    Harishnaika N
    [J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 3057 - 3073
  • [4] Correction to: Land use and land cover classification using machine learning algorithms in google earth engine
    Arpitha M
    S A Ahmed
    N Harishnaika
    [J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 3075 - 3075
  • [5] Assessing Machine Learning Algorithms for Land Use and Land Cover Classification in Morocco Using Google Earth Engine
    Ouchra, Hafsa
    Belangour, Abdessamad
    Erraissi, Allae
    Banane, Mouad
    [J]. IMAGE ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING - ICIAP 2023 WORKSHOPS, PT I, 2024, 14365 : 395 - 405
  • [6] Detailed and automated classification of land use/land cover using machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine
    Pan, Xia
    Wang, Zhenyi
    Gao, Yong
    Dang, Xiaohong
    Han, Yanlong
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (18) : 5415 - 5432
  • [7] Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Using Machine Learning Algorithms on Google Earth Engine for Munneru River Basin, India
    Loukika, Kotapati Narayana
    Keesara, Venkata Reddy
    Sridhar, Venkataramana
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [8] Addressing the impact of land use land cover changes on land surface temperature using machine learning algorithms
    Sajid Ullah
    Xiuchen Qiao
    Mohsin Abbas
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [9] Land Use/Land Cover Classification Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for EuroSAT Dataset - A Review
    Loganathan, Agilandeeswari
    Koushmitha, Suri
    Arun, Yerru Nanda Krishna
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, ISDA 2021, 2022, 418 : 1363 - 1374
  • [10] Statistical comparison of simple and machine learning based land use and land cover classification algorithms: A case study
    Rawat, K. S.
    Kumar, S.
    Garg, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING, 2024, 32