Avoidance and management of positive surgical margins before, during and after radical prostatectomy

被引:22
|
作者
Bott, SRJ [1 ]
Kirby, RS
机构
[1] Inst Urol & Nephrol, 67 Riding House St, London W1W 7EY, England
[2] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Dept Urol, London, England
关键词
prostate cancer; prostatectomy; surgical margins; prevention; treatment;
D O I
10.1038/sj.pcan.4500612
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy lead to an increased risk of progression and reduced disease free survival. Earlier detection of prostate cancer, appropriate patient selection and improved operative techniques can reduce the incidence of positive margins, though the risk can not be eliminated as preoperative staging techniques are not sufficiently sensitive. Nerve sparing and bladder neck sparing do not adversely affect margin status in appropriately selected men. Once positive margins have been diagnosed the optimal management and the timing of treatment remains controversial. Adjuvant radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy in men with a low PSA may improve local control and PSA free survival in some individuals, a survival benefit has not yet been established.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:252 / 263
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] INFLUENCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS ON ADJUVANT TREATMENT AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Perez, Doron
    Shental, Joseph
    Salomon, Laurent
    Abbou, Claude C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 776 - 776
  • [12] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF FOCAL POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kim, Ki Bom
    Lee, In Jae
    Kim, Tae Jin
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong-Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Noh, Choong Hee
    Lee, Sang Eun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E685 - E685
  • [13] Prognostic Value of Focal Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy
    Lee, Sangchul
    Kim, Ki Bom
    Jo, Jung Ki
    Ho, Jin-Nyoung
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Lee, Sang Eun
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2016, 14 (04) : E313 - E319
  • [14] Influence of positive surgical margins on adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy
    Larre, Stephane
    Salomon, Laurent
    De la Taille, Alexandre
    Allory, Yves
    Hoznek, Andras
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Yiou, Rene
    Abbou, Clement-Claude
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 158 - 158
  • [15] Race is not an independent predictor of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Witte, MN
    Kattan, MW
    Albani, J
    Sharp, DS
    Eastham, JA
    Morton, RA
    UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (05) : 869 - 874
  • [16] Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization
    Fontenot, Philip A.
    Mansour, Ahmed M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (08) : E290 - E299
  • [17] Influence of positive surgical margins on adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy
    Salomon, L.
    Larre, S.
    De La Taille, A.
    Allory, Y.
    Hoznek, A.
    Vordos, D.
    Yiou, R.
    Abbou, C. C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 153 - 153
  • [18] A prospective study of positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Thoulouzan, M.
    Aillet, G.
    Chauveau, P.
    Colls, P.
    Pocholle, P.
    Hetet, J. F.
    Barre, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 154 - 154
  • [19] MANAGEMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF A CONTEMPORARY COHORT
    Palumbo, Carlotta
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Galvagni, Giacomo
    Mittino, Irene
    Furlan, Maria
    Zamboni, Stefania
    Francavilla, Simone
    Lattarulo, Marco
    Peroni, Angelo
    Simeone, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E37 - E37
  • [20] Zero positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: is the end in sight?
    Skarecky, Douglas W.
    Brenner, Matthew
    Rajan, Sudhir S.
    Rodriguez, Esequiel, Jr.
    Narula, Navneet
    Melgoza, Frank
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (06) : 709 - 717