Antidepressant response trajectories and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) biomarkers in major depressive disorder

被引:56
|
作者
Hunter, Aimee M. [1 ]
Muthen, Bengt O. [2 ]
Cook, Ian A. [1 ]
Leuchter, Andrew F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Semel Inst Neurosci & Human Behav, Dept Psychiat & Biobehav Sci, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Grad Sch Educ & Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
Depression; EEG; Cordance; Antidepressants; Statistical models; Growth mixture modeling; TRUE DRUG RESPONSE; STAR-ASTERISK-D; VENLAFAXINE; FLUOXETINE; OUTCOMES; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PREDICTOR; CORDANCE; PLACEBO; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.006
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) vary regarding the rate, magnitude and stability of symptom changes during antidepressant treatment. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) can be used to identify patterns of change in symptom severity over time. Quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) cordance within the first week of treatment has been associated with endpoint clinical outcomes but has not been examined in relation to patterns of symptom change. Ninety-four adults with MDD were randomized to eight weeks of double-blinded treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg or venlafaxine 150 mg (n = 49) or placebo (n = 45). An exploratory random effect GMM was applied to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D-17) scores over 11 timepoints. Linear mixed models examined 48-h. and 1-week changes in QEEG midline-and-right-frontal (MRF) cordance for subjects in the GMM trajectory classes. Among medication subjects an estimated 62% of subjects were classified as responders, 21% as non-responders, and 17% as symptomatically volatile-i.e., showing a course of alternating improvement and worsening. MRF cordance showed a significant class-by-time interaction (F-(2,F-41) = 6.82, p = .003); as hypothesized, the responders showed a significantly greater 1-week decrease in cordance as compared to non-responders (mean difference = -.76, Std. Error = 34, df = 73, p = .03) but not volatile subjects. Subjects with a volatile course of symptom change may merit special clinical consideration and, from a research perspective, may confound the interpretation of typical binary endpoint outcomes. Statistical methods such as GMM are needed to identify clinically relevant symptom response trajectories. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 98
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cerebral Blood Perfusion Predictors of Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder
    Cooper, Crystal
    Fatt, Cherise Chin
    Fonzo, Gregory
    Jha, Manish
    Grannemann, Bruce
    Aslan, Sina
    Almeida, Jorge
    Deckersbach, Thilo
    Fava, Maurizio
    Kurian, Benji
    McGrath, Patrick
    McInnis, Melvin
    Parsey, Ramin
    Weissman, Myrna
    Phillips, Mary
    Lu, Hanzhang
    Etkin, Amit
    Trivedi, Madhukar
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 83 (09) : S399 - S399
  • [22] Altered Brain Entropy as a predictor of antidepressant response in major depressive disorder
    Liu Xiaoyun
    Song Donghui
    Yin Yingying
    Xie Chunming
    Zhang Haisan
    Zhang Hongxing
    Zhang Zhijun
    Wang Ze
    Yuan Yonggui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 260 : 716 - 721
  • [23] Duration of untreated illness and antidepressant fluvoxamine response in major depressive disorder
    Okuda, Akiko
    Suzuki, Tatsuyo
    Kishi, Taro
    Yamanouchi, Yoshio
    Umeda, Kazunori
    Haitoh, Hiroshi
    Hashimoto, Shuji
    Ozaki, Norio
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 64 (03) : 268 - 273
  • [24] The promise of the quantitative electroencephalogram as a predictor of antidepressant treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder
    Hunter, Aimee M.
    Cook, Ian A.
    Leuchter, Andrew F.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 30 (01) : 105 - +
  • [26] Clinical and neurophysiological biomarkers of ketamine's antidepressant effect in major depressive disorder patients
    Sos, P.
    Klirova, M.
    Novak, T.
    Brunovsky, M.
    Horacek, J.
    Hoschl, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S467 - S467
  • [27] Response trajectories during escitalopram treatment of patients with major depressive disorder
    Nunez, John-Jose
    Liu, Yang S.
    Cao, Bo
    Frey, Benicio N.
    Ho, Keith
    Milev, Roumen
    Mueller, Daniel J.
    Rotzinger, Susan
    Soares, Claudio N.
    Taylor, Valerie H.
    Uher, Rudolf
    Kennedy, Sidney H.
    Lam, Raymond W.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2023, 327
  • [28] Neural Network Based Response Prediction of rTMS in Major Depressive Disorder Using QEEG Cordance
    Erguzel, Turker Tekin
    Ozekes, Serhat
    Gultekin, Selahattin
    Tarhan, Nevzat
    Sayar, Gokben Hizli
    Bayram, Ali
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 12 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [29] Valproic acid as an antidepressant in major depressive disorder
    Davis, LL
    Petty, F
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 32 (03) : 430 - 430
  • [30] Major depressive disorder: Biomarkers and biosensors
    Dadkhah, Masoomeh
    Jafarzadehgharehziaaddin, Mohsen
    Molaei, Soheila
    Akbari, Morteza
    Gholizadeh, Negin
    Fathi, Farzaneh
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2023, 547