Antidepressant response trajectories and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) biomarkers in major depressive disorder

被引:56
|
作者
Hunter, Aimee M. [1 ]
Muthen, Bengt O. [2 ]
Cook, Ian A. [1 ]
Leuchter, Andrew F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Semel Inst Neurosci & Human Behav, Dept Psychiat & Biobehav Sci, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Grad Sch Educ & Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
Depression; EEG; Cordance; Antidepressants; Statistical models; Growth mixture modeling; TRUE DRUG RESPONSE; STAR-ASTERISK-D; VENLAFAXINE; FLUOXETINE; OUTCOMES; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PREDICTOR; CORDANCE; PLACEBO; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.006
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) vary regarding the rate, magnitude and stability of symptom changes during antidepressant treatment. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) can be used to identify patterns of change in symptom severity over time. Quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) cordance within the first week of treatment has been associated with endpoint clinical outcomes but has not been examined in relation to patterns of symptom change. Ninety-four adults with MDD were randomized to eight weeks of double-blinded treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg or venlafaxine 150 mg (n = 49) or placebo (n = 45). An exploratory random effect GMM was applied to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D-17) scores over 11 timepoints. Linear mixed models examined 48-h. and 1-week changes in QEEG midline-and-right-frontal (MRF) cordance for subjects in the GMM trajectory classes. Among medication subjects an estimated 62% of subjects were classified as responders, 21% as non-responders, and 17% as symptomatically volatile-i.e., showing a course of alternating improvement and worsening. MRF cordance showed a significant class-by-time interaction (F-(2,F-41) = 6.82, p = .003); as hypothesized, the responders showed a significantly greater 1-week decrease in cordance as compared to non-responders (mean difference = -.76, Std. Error = 34, df = 73, p = .03) but not volatile subjects. Subjects with a volatile course of symptom change may merit special clinical consideration and, from a research perspective, may confound the interpretation of typical binary endpoint outcomes. Statistical methods such as GMM are needed to identify clinically relevant symptom response trajectories. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 98
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QEEG biomarkers of sustained response to rapid antidepressant effect of NMDA antagonist in major depressive disorder
    Sos, P.
    Klirova, M.
    Novak, T.
    Brunovsky, M.
    Horacek, J.
    Bares, M.
    Hoschl, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 17 : 160 - 160
  • [2] Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) to discriminate Primary Degenerative Dementia from Major Depressive Disorder (Depression)
    Deslandes, A
    Veiga, H
    Cagy, M
    Fiszman, A
    Piedade, R
    Ribeiro, P
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2004, 62 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [3] Resting State Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG) Demonstrates Differential Connectivity in Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder
    Mcvoy, Molly
    Lytle, Sarah
    Aebi, Michelle
    Elizabeth, Deyling
    Samden, Lhatoo
    Loparo, Kenneth
    Kaffashi, Farhad
    Woods, Nicole
    Sajatovic, Martha
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 43 : S304 - S304
  • [4] MicroRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers and Predictors of Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review
    Carneiro, Beatriz A.
    Guerreiro-Costa, Livia N. Franco
    Lins-Silva, Daniel
    Guimaraes, Daniela Faria
    Souza, Lucca S.
    Leal, Gustavo C.
    Caliman-Fontes, Ana Teresa
    Beanes, Graziele
    Costa, Ryan Dos S.
    Quarantini, Lucas C.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [5] Growth Factors as Biomarkers of Major Depressive Disorder and Potential Predictors of Antidepressant Drug Response
    Halaris, Angelos
    Clark-Raymond, Anne
    Meresh, Edwin
    Sharma, Aparna
    Kang, Robin
    Hage, Brandon
    Morrissey, Kathryn
    Fareed, Jawed
    Pandey, Ghanshyam
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 38 : S502 - S503
  • [6] ANTIDEPRESSANT RESPONSE IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AND RARE VARIANTS
    Wong, Ma-Li
    Arcos-Burgos, Mauricio
    Licinio, Julio
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 : 1304 - 1304
  • [7] Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder
    Papakostas, George I.
    Jackson, W. Clay
    Rafeyan, Roueen
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 81 (03)
  • [8] Quantitative electroencephalographic biomarkers behind major depressive disorder
    Knocikova, Juliana A.
    Petrasek, Tomas
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2021, 68
  • [9] EEG and QEEG biomarkers as predictors of antidepressant treatment response
    Radziszewska, Monika
    Kazmierski, Jakub
    Sobow, Tomasz
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 15 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [10] Technical and clinical considerations for electroencephalography-based biomarkers for major depressive disorder
    Leif Simmatis
    Emma E. Russo
    Joseph Geraci
    Irene E. Harmsen
    Nardin Samuel
    [J]. npj Mental Health Research, 2 (1):