Assessing optimality and robustness of control over quantum dynamics

被引:25
|
作者
Demiralp, M [1 ]
Rabitz, H
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Chem, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Sci & Letters, Dept Engn Sci, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 1998年 / 57卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2420
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
This work presents a general framework for assessing the quality and robustness of control over quantum dynamics induced by an optical field epsilon(t). The control process is expressed in terms of a cost functional, including the physical objectives, penalties, and constraints. The first variations of such cost functionals have traditionally been utilized to create designs for the controlling electric fields. Here, the second variation of the cost functional is analyzed to explore (i) whether such solutions are locally optimal, and (ii) their degree of robustness. Both issues may be assessed from the eigenvalues of the stability operator S whose kernel K(t, tau) is related to delta epsilon(t)/delta epsilon(tau)\(c) for 0<t, tau less than or equal to T, where T is the target control time. Here c denotes the constraint that the field satisfies the optimal control dynamical equations. The eigenvalues sigma of S satisfying sigma<1 assure local optimality of the control solution, with sigma=1 being the critical value separating optimal solutions from false solutions (i.e., those with negative second variational curvature of the cost functional). In turn, the maximally robust control solutions with the least sensitivity to field errors also correspond to sigma=1. Thus, sufficiently high sensitivity of the field at one time t to the field at another time tau(i.e., sigma> 1) will lead to a loss of local optimality. An expression is obtained for a bound on the stability operator, and this result is employed to qualitatively analyze control behavior. From this bound, the inclusion of an auxiliary operator (i.e., other than the target operator) is shown to act as a stabilizer of the control process. It is also shown that robust solutions are expected to exist in both the strong-and weak-field regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:2420 / 2425
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robustness of quantum algorithms against coherent control errors
    Berberich, Julian
    Fink, Daniel
    Holm, Christian
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 109 (01)
  • [42] Towards noise robustness in optimal quantum control experiments
    Bartelt, A
    Roth, M
    Mehendale, M
    Rabitz, H
    2005 CONFERENCE ON LASERS & ELECTRO-OPTICS (CLEO), VOLS 1-3, 2005, : 500 - 502
  • [43] Comparison and control of the robustness between quantum entanglement and quantum correlation in an open quantum system
    嵇英华
    胡菊菊
    胡燕
    Chinese Physics B, 2012, (11) : 81 - 86
  • [44] Comparison and control of the robustness between quantum entanglement and quantum correlation in an open quantum system
    Ji Ying-Hua
    Hu Ju-Ju
    Hu Yan
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2012, 21 (11)
  • [45] Improving robustness of quantum feedback control with reinforcement learning
    Guatto, Manuel
    Susto, Gian Antonio
    Ticozzi, Francesco
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 110 (01)
  • [46] Robustness, evolvability, and optimality of evolutionary neural networks
    Palmes, PP
    Usui, S
    BIOSYSTEMS, 2005, 82 (02) : 168 - 188
  • [48] Assessing Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics
    Wolf, M. M.
    Eisert, J.
    Cubitt, T. S.
    Cirac, J. I.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2008, 101 (15)
  • [49] Robustness and performance issues for advanced control of vehicle dynamics
    Ganzelmeier, L
    Helbig, J
    Schnieder, E
    2001 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS - PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 798 - 801
  • [50] Assessing Quantum Dimensionality from Observable Dynamics
    Wolf, Michael M.
    Perez-Garcia, David
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2009, 102 (19)