Assessing optimality and robustness of control over quantum dynamics

被引:25
|
作者
Demiralp, M [1 ]
Rabitz, H
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Chem, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Sci & Letters, Dept Engn Sci, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 1998年 / 57卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2420
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
This work presents a general framework for assessing the quality and robustness of control over quantum dynamics induced by an optical field epsilon(t). The control process is expressed in terms of a cost functional, including the physical objectives, penalties, and constraints. The first variations of such cost functionals have traditionally been utilized to create designs for the controlling electric fields. Here, the second variation of the cost functional is analyzed to explore (i) whether such solutions are locally optimal, and (ii) their degree of robustness. Both issues may be assessed from the eigenvalues of the stability operator S whose kernel K(t, tau) is related to delta epsilon(t)/delta epsilon(tau)\(c) for 0<t, tau less than or equal to T, where T is the target control time. Here c denotes the constraint that the field satisfies the optimal control dynamical equations. The eigenvalues sigma of S satisfying sigma<1 assure local optimality of the control solution, with sigma=1 being the critical value separating optimal solutions from false solutions (i.e., those with negative second variational curvature of the cost functional). In turn, the maximally robust control solutions with the least sensitivity to field errors also correspond to sigma=1. Thus, sufficiently high sensitivity of the field at one time t to the field at another time tau(i.e., sigma> 1) will lead to a loss of local optimality. An expression is obtained for a bound on the stability operator, and this result is employed to qualitatively analyze control behavior. From this bound, the inclusion of an auxiliary operator (i.e., other than the target operator) is shown to act as a stabilizer of the control process. It is also shown that robust solutions are expected to exist in both the strong-and weak-field regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:2420 / 2425
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing optimality and robustness for the control of dynamical systems
    Demiralp, M
    Rabitz, H
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2000, 61 (03): : 2569 - 2578
  • [2] Trading robustness with optimality in nonlinear control
    Astolfi, A
    Colaneri, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2000, : 3878 - 3882
  • [3] Trading robustness with optimality in nonlinear control
    Astolfi, A
    Colaneri, P
    AUTOMATICA, 2001, 37 (12) : 1961 - 1969
  • [4] Compartmental flow control: Decentralization, robustness and optimality
    Blanchini, Franco
    Franco, Elisa
    Giordano, Giulia
    Mardanlou, Vahid
    Montessoro, Pier Luca
    AUTOMATICA, 2016, 64 : 18 - 28
  • [5] Assessing the robustness and optimality of alternative decision rules with varying assumptions
    Luttbeg, B
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2002, 63 : 805 - 814
  • [6] Robustness of controlled quantum dynamics
    Koswara, Andy
    Chakrabarti, Raj
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2014, 90 (04):
  • [7] Optimality and universality in quantum Zeno dynamics
    Belan, Sergey
    Parfenyev, Vladimir
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2020, 22 (07)
  • [8] Integrating robustness, optimality and constraints in control of nonlinear processes
    El-Farra, NH
    Christofides, PD
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2001, 56 (05) : 1841 - 1868
  • [9] Passivity Based Distributed Control: Optimality, Stability and Robustness
    Wen, John T.
    2013 9TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ROBOT MOTION AND CONTROL (ROMOCO), 2013, : 180 - 185
  • [10] Formulas for Data-Driven Control: Stabilization, Optimality, and Robustness
    De Persis, Claudio
    Tesi, Pietro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2020, 65 (03) : 909 - 924