Receiver Comparisons on an OFDM Design for Doppler Spread Channels

被引:0
|
作者
Mason, Sean F. [1 ]
Berger, Christian R. [1 ]
Zhou, Shengli [1 ]
Ball, Keenan R. [2 ]
Freitag, Lee [2 ]
Willett, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Appl Ocean Phys & Engn, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
关键词
MULTICARRIER COMMUNICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Underwater acoustic channels induce large Doppler drifts that render intercarrier interference (ICI) for OFDM transmissions. Assuming that after proper Doppler compensation the residual ICI is limited to only direct neighbors, we propose an OFDM signal design that decouples channel estimation and data demodulation. We investigate eight receivers that are categorized into three groups: (i) three receivers that ignore the residual ICI, (ii) three receivers that are based on a basis expansion model (BEM) and pursue channel estimation independently along each basis, and (iii) two receivers that are based on discrete-path modeling. The receiver performance is compared based on data from the SPACE experiment conducted off the coast of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, October 2008. The receiver based on the discrete-path modeling and a basis pursuit algorithm achieves the best performance while the receiver based on BEM and least-squares channel estimation performs the worst. The performance differences among different receivers drastically increase as the channel's Doppler spread and the signal constellation size increase. Interestingly, the BEM based receivers are often inferior to the ICI-ignorant counterparts, implying that the ability of ICI compensation could be limited by the estimation accuracy of the much increased number of model parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Receiver design for spread-spectrum communications with a small spread in underwater clustered multipath channels
    Kuai, Xiaoyan
    Zhou, Shengli
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Cheng, En
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 141 (03): : 1627 - 1642
  • [22] Receiver design for MIMO-OFDM transmission over time variant channels
    Al-Naffouri, TY
    Awoniyi, O
    Oteri, O
    Paulraj, A
    [J]. GLOBECOM '04: IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2004, : 2487 - 2492
  • [23] Doppler spread estimation for wireless OFDM systems
    Yücek, T
    Tannious, RMA
    Arslan, H
    [J]. 2005 IEEE SARNOFF SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCES IN WIRED AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, 2005, : 232 - 235
  • [24] Analysis of Doppler spread perturbations in OFDM(A) systems
    Robertson, P
    Kaiser, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 11 (06): : 585 - 592
  • [25] Optimized LDPC codes for OFDM and spread OFDM in correlated channels
    Serener, Ali
    Natarajan, Balasubramaniam
    Gruenbacher, Don M.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE 65TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 2276 - +
  • [26] An adaptive diversity receiver for OFDM in fading channels
    Bulumulla, SB
    Kassam, SA
    Venkatesh, SS
    [J]. ICC 98 - 1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 1325 - 1329
  • [27] Optimum receiver design for broadband Doppler compensation in multipath/Doppler channels with rational orthogonal wavelet signaling
    Yu, Limin
    White, Langford B.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 55 (08) : 4091 - 4103
  • [28] Doppler Spread Estimation by Tracking the Delay-Subspace for OFDM Systems in Doubly Selective Fading Channels
    Zhao, Xiaochuan
    Peng, Tao
    Yang, Ming
    Wang, Wenbo
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2009, 16 (1-3) : 212 - 215
  • [29] Research on the Application of DPSK Technology in OFDM Doppler Receiver
    Fu, Yao
    Chen, Xueyan
    Ma, Yufeng
    Wang, Hongyuan
    [J]. AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, PTS 1-4, 2012, 468-471 : 2206 - 2210
  • [30] An Enhanced Doppler Spread Estimation Method for OFDM Systems
    Sheng, Bin
    Zhu, Pengcheng
    You, Xiaohu
    [J]. IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, E95B (12) : 3911 - 3914