Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy

被引:32
|
作者
Vachon-Marceau, Chantale [1 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Roberge, Stephanie [2 ]
Gauthier, Robert J. [3 ]
Pasquier, Jean-Charles [4 ]
Girard, Mario [2 ]
Chaillet, Nils [1 ,2 ]
Boulvain, Michel [5 ]
Jastrow, Nicole [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Geneva, Hop Univ Geneve, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cesarean; pregnancy; surgical technique; ultrasound; uterine scar; INTERDELIVERY INTERVAL; VAGINAL BIRTH; RUPTURE; RISK; DELIVERY; SECTION; TRIAL; LABOR; INCISION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.042
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Uterine rupture is a potential life-threatening complication during a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Single-layer closure of the uterus at cesarean delivery has been associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture compared with double-layer closure. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement by ultrasound has been used to evaluate the quality of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery and is associated with the risk of uterine rupture. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of previous uterine closure on lower uterine segment thickness. STUDY DESIGN: Women with a previous single low-transverse cesarean delivery were recruited at 34-38 weeks' gestation. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness was performed by a sonographer blinded to clinical data. Previous operative reports were reviewed to obtain the type of previous uterine closure. Third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness at the next pregnancy was compared according to the number of layers sutured and according to the type of thread for uterine closure, using weighted mean differences and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1613 women recruited, with operative reports available, 495 (31%) had a single-layer and 1118 (69%) had a double-layer closure. The mean third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness was 3.3 +/- 1.3 mm and the proportion with lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm was 10.5%. Double-layer closure of the uterus was associated with a thicker lower uterine segment than single-layer closure (weighted mean difference: 0.11 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.21 mm). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, a double-layer closure also was associated with a reduced risk of lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm (odd ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.90). Compared with synthetic thread, the use of catgut for uterine closure had no significant impact on third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness (WMD: -0.10 mm; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.02 mm) or on the risk of lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.33). Finally, double-layer closure was associated with a reduced risk of uterine scar defect (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.61) at birth. CONCLUSION: Compared with single-layer closure, a double-layer closure of the uterus at previous cesarean delivery is associated with a thicker third-trimester lower uterine segment and a reduced risk of lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm in the next pregnancy. The type of thread for uterine closure has no significant impact on lower uterine segment thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:65.e1 / 65.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy
    Brahmalakshmy, B. L.
    Kushtagi, Pralhad
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (04) : 755 - 762
  • [32] Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy
    B. L. Brahmalakshmy
    Pralhad Kushtagi
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 755 - 762
  • [33] Lower Segment Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Cause of Uterine Rupture in the First Trimester
    Gupta, Anjali
    Sirohiwal, Daya
    Duhan, Nirmala
    Bishnoi, Sarita
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2012, 28 (02) : 179 - 181
  • [34] Purse-string double-layer closure: A novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section
    Turan, Cem
    Buyukbayrak, Esra Esim
    Yilmaz, Aylin Onan
    Karsidag, Yasemin Karageyim
    Pirimoglu, Meltem
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (04) : 565 - 574
  • [35] Transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to assess the thickness of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean section
    Afifi, Ahmed Nagy
    Taymour, Mohammad Ahmed
    El-Khayat, Waleed Mamdouh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 271 : 145 - 151
  • [36] Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Demers, Suzanne
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05) : 453 - 460
  • [37] Single versus double layer closure and the risk of uterine rupture: A multicentre VBAC study
    Goyet, M
    Bujold, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S20 - S20
  • [38] Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in pregnant women with previous cesarean section
    Mohammed, Abdel Baset F.
    Al-Moghazi, Diaa A.
    Hamdy, Mamdouh T.
    Mohammed, Enas M.
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (03) : 188 - 193
  • [39] Thickness of the lower uterine segment: its influence in the management of patients with previous cesarean sections
    Rozenberg, P
    Goffinet, F
    Philippe, HJ
    Nisand, I
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 87 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [40] Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery
    Peter Uharček
    Alexander Brešťanský
    Jozef Ravinger
    Andrea Máňová
    Mária Zajacová
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 292 : 609 - 612