The Royal College of Emergency Medicine composite pain scale for children: level of inter-rater agreement

被引:4
|
作者
James, Ffion [1 ]
Edwards, Rosie [2 ]
James, Nirmal [2 ]
Dyer, Rhian [3 ]
Goodwin, Victoria [4 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Fac Med, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Royal Gwent Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Cardiff Rd, Newport NP20 2UB, Gwent, Wales
[3] Princess Wales Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Bridgend, Wales
[4] Prince Charles Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Merthyr Tydfil, M Glam, Wales
关键词
RATING-SCALE; SELF-REPORT; VALIDATION; TRIAGE;
D O I
10.1136/emermed-2015-205517
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the inter-rater agreement of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) Composite Pain Scale. Methods A prospective, observational study of 117 children who presented to the ED with pain due to a limb injury. Pain severity was assessed by the triage nurse, doctor and child (depending on their age) using indicators of the RCEM Composite Pain Scale. This pain scale comprises a modified Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FACES Scale), a Behaviour scale and a numerical rating scale (Ladder). Comparisons were made between scores from individual scales and raters. Results 117 children (26 aged 0-8 years (group 1) and 91 aged >8-16 years (group 2)) were enrolled in the study. Pain in group 1 was assessed by the nurse and doctor using the FACES Scale and the Behaviour scale. The FACES Scale demonstrated greater inter-rater agreement than the Behaviour scale. Pain in group 2 was assessed by the nurse and doctor using the Behaviour scale and by the child using the FACES Scale and Ladder. The Ladder demonstrated poor inter-rater agreement in comparison with the Behaviour Score. Conclusion The Ladder score could be omitted from this composite tool as it has poor inter-rater agreement in comparison with the other indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 363
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条