AUTOMATIC FLIGHT ENVELOPE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT

被引:0
|
作者
Wilson, John M. [1 ]
Peters, Mark E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wilson Engn, Hanover, NH USA
[2] Sensis Corp, Hampton, VA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Aircraft loss-of-control accidents account for about 38% of the fatal accidents in U.S. General Aviation operations each year. Loss-of-control accidents include VFR-into-IMC with subsequent disorientation and loss of aircraft control, low-speed stall-spin accidents in the airport traffic pattern, and high-speed accelerated stall accidents during low-level maneuvering. The majority of these accidents could be prevented by full-time flight envelope protection having functionality similar to that available in fly-by-wire systems on newer military and civil transport aircraft. However, fly-by-wire systems would likely be prohibitively expensive to implement in most GA aircraft; and would be impractical for retrofit applications. Under FAA sponsorship, we are developing a new approach to GA Envelope Protection that preserves the existing cable control system, while providing full-time pilot-in-the-loop stability augmentation and flight-envelope protection. This approach, called Force gradient Control, is made possible by leveraging a new concept in the design of autopilot servos. Under this development effort, we are working to validate feedback control algorithms using a high-fidelity ground-based simulator, in preparation for flight demonstrations using a representative light aircraft. This approach to preventing loss-of-control accidents should be economically viable for both retrofit and forward-fit applications within the General Aviation light-aircraft fleet.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PILOT HEART RATE DURING IN-FLIGHT SIMULATED INSTRUMENT APPROACHES IN A GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT
    HASBROOK, AH
    RASMUSSEN, PG
    [J]. AEROSPACE MEDICINE, 1970, 41 (10): : 1148 - +
  • [32] General Aviation Twin-Engine Aircraft Gear and Flap Parasite Drag Flight Tests
    Rogers, David F.
    Fasciano, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2016, 53 (04): : 1174 - 1176
  • [33] The case for flight simulation in general aviation
    Allerton, DJ
    [J]. AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 106 (1065): : 607 - 612
  • [34] Envelope Protection Reconfiguration for Iced Aircraft
    Zheng, Sizhuang
    Wang, Lixin
    Yue, Ting
    Liu, Hailiang
    [J]. 2021 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL AND AEROSPACE ENGINEERING (ICMAE), 2021, : 108 - 112
  • [35] GENERAL AVIATION FLIGHT INSTRUMENT DISPLAYS
    NEWMAN, RL
    PALMER, GM
    [J]. CANADIAN AERONAUTICS AND SPACE JOURNAL, 1978, 24 (03): : 168 - 175
  • [36] GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT SUFFER HIGH LOADS CLOSE TO DESIGN LIMIT DESPITE LARGE DESIGN ENVELOPE
    JEWEL, JW
    [J]. SAE JOURNAL, 1969, 77 (08): : 31 - &
  • [38] EVALUATION OF GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FLYING QUALITIES
    BARBER, MR
    HAISE, FW
    JONES, CK
    [J]. SAE TRANSACTIONS, 1967, 75 : 93 - &
  • [39] Inner Loop Command Interface in a Modular Flight Control Architecture for Trajectory Flights of General Aviation Aircraft
    Schatz, Simon P.
    Gabrys, Agnes C.
    Gierszewski, Daniel M.
    Holzapfel, Florian
    [J]. 2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT), 2018, : 86 - 91
  • [40] STALLING CHARACTERISTICS OF A GENERAL-AVIATION AIRCRAFT
    STENGEL, RF
    NIXON, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1982, 19 (06): : 425 - 434