Freedom and a right (not) to know

The article discusses the relationship between the nation of a moral right to personal self-determination, the notion of a moral right to know and the notion of a moral right not to know. In particular, the author asks under what conditions, if any, the right to self-determination implies a right to have information ora right not to have information. The conclusions he defends are theoretical in character rather than concrete norms and directions, and they are intended to be relevant in many contexts, not only in the context of information concerning, say, medical decisions. Tet the author restates the question concerning the right to have and especially the right not to have genetic knowledge about one's own genes on the basis of a right to self-determination. He argues that a right (not) to have genetic information can be defended on the ground of a right to self-determination, but that this kind of defense presupposes several normative, and controversial, arguments.