Relationships between technical efficiency and financial management for czech republic farms

被引:64
|
作者
Davidova, Sophia
Latruffe, Laure
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Ashford TN25 5AH, Kent, England
[2] INRA, F-35042 Rennes, France
关键词
bootstrapping; Czech Republic; data envelopment analysis; endogeneity; farms; financial structure;
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00109.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This paper provides the first analysis of the relationship between farm financial structure and technical efficiency in Central and Eastern European farming during the transition to a market economy. First, technical efficiency scores for a sample of Czech farms are computed with data envelopment analysis, accounting for sampling variability by using the Simar and Wilson bootstrapping procedure. The confidence intervals show that corporate livestock farms are the most homogenous in terms of technical efficiency. Second, a Tobit model is applied for the investigation of factors, including financial considerations, which influence the variation in technical efficiency. The potential endogeneity of the financial variables in the explanation of efficiency is examined, following Smith and Blundell. The Amemiya estimator is used for those cases which are revealed as endogenous. The analysis indicates substantial differences in the way in which the different management structures are treated by lenders. De novo, individual farms are subject to stringent evaluation of their loan applications, which is not the case for the successors of the former collective and state farms.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 288
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Technical Efficiency of Retirement Homes Aggregated in Particular Districts of the Czech Republic
    Vankova, Ivana
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATION 2019, 2019, : 384 - 393
  • [22] Models of Static and Dynamic Technical Efficiency of City Libraries in the Czech Republic
    Vrabkova, Iveta
    Vankova, Ivana
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATION 2017, 2017, : 365 - 369
  • [23] Mycobacteria in the environment of pig farms in the Czech Republic between 2003 and 2007
    Krizova, K.
    Matlova, L.
    Horvathova, A.
    Moravkova, M.
    Beran, V.
    Boisselet, T.
    Babak, V.
    Slana, I.
    Pavlik, I.
    [J]. VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 2010, 55 (02) : 55 - 69
  • [24] Links Between Farm Size, Location and Productivity of Farms in the Czech Republic
    Redlichova, Radka
    Svobodova, Eliska
    Blazkova, Ivana
    Chmelikova, Gabriela
    Vinohradsky, Karel
    [J]. EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE, 2023, 15 (04): : 508 - 524
  • [25] Financial Stress Spillover and Financial Linkages between the Euro Area and the Czech Republic
    Adam, Tomas
    Benecka, Sona
    [J]. FINANCE A UVER-CZECH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2013, 63 (01): : 46 - 64
  • [26] Financial Literacy: An International Comparison between Germany and the Czech Republic
    Zureck, Alexander
    Svoboda, Martin
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL SYSTEMS 2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, 2015, : 704 - 709
  • [27] REFLECTION OF PARADIGMS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FAMILY AND SCHOOL IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Stolinska, Dominika Provazkova
    Raskova, Miluse
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, SOCIOLOGY AND HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION, VOL II, 2015, : 805 - 810
  • [28] Research to measure the efficiency of method of talent management in the Czech Republic
    Kursch, Martin
    [J]. VZDELAVANI DOSPELYCH 2017: V DOBE REZONUJICICH SPOLECENSKYCH ZMEN. IN TIMES OF RESONANT SOCIAL CHANGES, 2018, : 13 - 29
  • [29] Assessing the technical efficiency of public procurements in the bus transportation sector in the Czech Republic
    Hanauerova, Eliska
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2019, 66 : 105 - 111
  • [30] Zoological gardens in the Czech Republic and Slovakia from the view of technical efficiency and productivity
    Becica, Jiri
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC FINANCE 2016, 2016, : 132 - 139