Is a Distal Resection Margin of ≤ 1 cm Safe in Patients with Intermediate- to Low-Lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Yan, Han [1 ]
Wang, Peng-Yuan [1 ]
Wu, Ying-Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Cun [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Xishiku St 8, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Distal resection margin; Rectal cancer; Meta-analysis; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; INTRAMURAL SPREAD; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOWER; 3RD; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-022-05342-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is generally accepted that the distal resection margin of intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer should be greater than 2 cm and at least 1 cm in special cases. This study intends to investigate whether a distal resection margin <= 1 cm affects tumor outcomes for patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Sixteen studies included data for distal resection margins <= 1 cm (1684 cases) and > 1 cm (5877 cases), and 5 studies included survival data. Meta-analysis was used to compare the local recurrence rate and long-term survival of patients with distal resection margins > or <= 1 cm. Results The local recurrence rate in the <= 1-cm margin group (9.5%) was 2.3% higher than that in the > 1-cm margin group (7.2%) according to a fixed-effects model (RR [95% CI] 1.42 [1.18, 1.70], P < 0.001). The overall survival results of the five 1-cm margin studies showed an HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.75, 1.24) (P = 0.78). Subgroup analysis showed that the local recurrence rate in the subgroup with perioperative treatment was 1.2% lower in the <= 1-cm margin group (8.3%) than in the > 1-cm margin group (9.5%) (RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.63, 1.49], P = 0.90). In the surgery alone subgroup, the local recurrence rate was 4.7% higher in the <= 1-cm margin group (12.4%) than in the > 1-cm group (7.7%) (RR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.09, 2.83], P = 0.02). Conclusions For patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer undergoing surgery alone, a distal resection margin <= 1 cm may be not safe.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1803
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A 1cm Distal Bowel Margin is Safe for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Radiotherapy
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    Kazama, Shinsuke
    Nagawa, Hirokazu
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (116) : 1068 - 1074
  • [22] Ist ein aboraler Sicherheitsabstand von < 1 cm beim tiefen Rektumkarzinom noch zeitgemäß?Ergebnisse einer MetaanalyseAltering the therapeutic paradigm towards a distal bowel margin of < 1 cm in patients with low-lying rectal cancerA systematic review and commentary
    J. Reibetanz
    C.T. Germer
    Der Chirurg, 2013, 84 (8): : 701 - 701
  • [23] Iron Chelation Therapy in Low- to Intermediate- Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Sarah
    Zhang, Ming Chan
    Li, Allen
    Leong, Russell
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Crowther, Mark
    BLOOD, 2021, 138
  • [24] Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Octogenarian Patients Is it Safe? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Minghao
    Qin, Huabo
    Luo, Qianxin
    He, Xiaosheng
    Lan, Ping
    Lian, Lei
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (42) : e1765
  • [25] IS ONCOLOGICALLY SAFE THE SHORT DISTAL RESECTION MARGIN IN LOW RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION THERAPY?
    Cho, H.
    Kim, G.
    Yoo, R.
    Kye, B.
    Kim, H.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E248 - E249
  • [26] Impact of Resection Margin Distance on Survival of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Kyung Su
    Kwon, Jeanny
    Kim, Kyubo
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 49 (03): : 824 - 833
  • [27] Authors' reply re: Vaginal delivery in women with a low-lying placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jansen, Charlotte
    Pajkrt, Eva
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (03) : 429 - 430
  • [28] Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Detering, Robin
    Rutgers, Marieke L. W.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Hompes, Roel
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (02) : 412 - 431
  • [29] Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xubing
    Wu, Qingbin
    Hu, Tao
    Gu, Chaoyang
    Bi, Liang
    Wang, Ziqiang
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (02): : 189 - 200
  • [30] Venous Resection for Pancreatic Cancer, a Safe and Feasible Option? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zwart, E. S.
    Yilmaz, B. S.
    Halimi, A.
    Ahola, R.
    Kurlinkus, B.
    Laukkarinen, J.
    Ceyhan, G. O.
    PANCREAS, 2020, 49 (10) : 1442 - 1442