Is Follow-Up Testing with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal Multiplex PCR Panel Necessary?

被引:23
|
作者
Park, Sholhui [1 ,4 ]
Hitchcock, Matthew M. [3 ]
Gomez, Carlos A. [2 ,4 ]
Banaei, Niaz [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis & Geog Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Hlth Care, Clin Microbiol Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
FilmArray gastrointestinal; GI PCR; repeat; syndromic; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION; DIAGNOSIS; GUIDELINES; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02354-16
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The FilmArray gastrointestinal (GI) panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) is a simple, sample-to-answer, on-demand, multiplex, nucleic acid amplification test for syndromic diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to measure the yield of follow-up testing with FilmArray GI panel within 4 weeks of an initial test. Consecutive adult and pediatric patients tested at an academic institution between August 2015 and June 2016 were included in this study. Of 145 follow-up tests in 106 unique patients with an initial negative result, 134 (92.4%) tests and 98 (92.5%) patients remained negative upon follow-up testing. Excluding targets that are not reported at this institution (Clostridium difficile, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, enteropathogenic E. coli, and enterotoxigenic E. coli), 137 (94.5%) follow-up tests and 101 (95.3%) patients remained negative. Weekly conversion rates were not significantly different across the 4-week follow-up interval. No epidemiological or clinical factors were significantly associated with a negative to positive conversion. Of 80 follow-up tests in patients with an initial positive result, 43 (53.8%) remained positive for the same target, 34 (42.5%) were negative, and 3 were positive for a different target (3.8%). Follow-up testing with FilmArray GI panel within 4 weeks of a negative result rarely changed the initial result, and the follow-up test reverted to negative less than half the time after an initial positive result. In the absence of clinical or epidemiological evidence for a new infection, follow-up testing should be limited and FilmArray GI panel should not be used as a test of cure.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1161
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Follow-up of pineal cysts in children: is it necessary?
    Miro-Pekka Jussila
    Päivi Olsén
    Niina Salokorpi
    Maria Suo-Palosaari
    [J]. Neuroradiology, 2017, 59 : 1265 - 1273
  • [32] Intensive follow-up of control subjects: Is it necessary?
    Alderman, BW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (05) : 744 - 745
  • [33] Is Ophthalmic Follow-up of Premature Infants Necessary?
    Chiu, Melissa
    Hennings, Charles
    Jain, Saurabh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2013, 50 (06) : 327 - 327
  • [34] ARE FOLLOW-UP X-RAYS NECESSARY
    SMITH, WL
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1979, 64 (01) : 123 - 124
  • [35] Multiplex Gastrointestinal Panel Testing in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Diarrhea in Thailand
    Jitmuang, Anupop
    Lertlaksameewilai, Panuwat
    Poorichitiporn, Arnon
    Horthongkham, Navin
    Chayakulkeeree, Methee
    [J]. OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 11 (07):
  • [36] On the Power and Legitimacy of Follow-Up Testing
    Tyler, Christopher
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2022, 51 (04) : 225 - 229
  • [37] Follow-up testing: The beginning of an answer
    Gibbons, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (04) : 520 - 522
  • [38] Follow-up testing: The beginning of an answer
    Raymond J. Gibbons
    [J]. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2001, 8 : 520 - 522
  • [39] FOLLOW-UP TESTING OF PATIENTS FOR SEROCONVERSION
    SOWA, PE
    HADLEY, WK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1989, 46 (12): : S16 - S17
  • [40] Posttreatment follow-up of brucellosis by PCR assay
    Morata, P
    Queipo-Ortuño, MI
    Reguera, JM
    García-Ordoñez, MA
    Pichardo, C
    Colmenero, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (12) : 4163 - 4166