Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer: Tumor Markers as Predictors of Pathologic Response, Recurrence, and Survival

被引:45
|
作者
Precht, Lisa M. [1 ]
Lowe, Kimberly A. [2 ]
Atwood, Mary [1 ]
Beatty, J. David [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Med Ctr, Swedish Canc Inst, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2010年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathologic response; recurrence; survival; tumor markers; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; HORMONAL RECEPTORS; EXPRESSION; HER-2; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DOXORUBICIN; DOCETAXEL; SUBTYPES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00935.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study reports the value of the tumor markers estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A community cancer center prospectively maintained breast cancer database containing over 8,000 patient records was used. Since 1989, 464 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and were tested for ER and PR. Estrogen receptor and/or PR positive patients were considered hormone receptor (HR) positive. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was available on 368 patients. Total, breast, and nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, recurrence, and overall survival were assessed. Total and breast pCR rates were higher in HR negative (HR-) patients (26% and 32%, respectively) than in HR positive (HR+) patients (4% and 7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared to HR+ patients, HR) patients had higher recurrence rates (38% versus 22%; p < 0.001), a shorter time to recurrence (1.28 versus 2.14 years; p < 0.001), and decreased overall survival (67% versus 81%; p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (NAT) demonstrated higher total pCR (34% versus 13%; p = 0.008), breast pCR (37% versus 17%; p = 0.02), and nodal pCR rates (47% versus 23%; p = 0.05) compared to HER2+ patients not treated with NAT. Furthermore, HER2+ patients who received NAT had lower recurrence rates (5% versus 42%; p < 0.001) and increased overall survival (97% versus 68%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, breast cancer HR status is predictive of total and breast pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although HR) patients derive greater benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of pathologic response, they have worse outcomes in terms of recurrence and survival. Hormone receptor positive patients demonstrate significantly less response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but significantly better overall outcome. For both HR) and HR+, addition of NAT for HER2+ tumors results in both a superior response and outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors of Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Johnson, Jeffrey
    Barmparas, Galinos
    Chung, Alice
    Giuliano, Armando
    Amersi, Farin
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : 86 - 87
  • [22] Gene expression and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Kolacinska, Agnieszka
    Fendler, Wojciech
    Szemraj, Janusz
    Szymanska, Bozena
    Borowska-Garganisz, Ewa
    Nowik, Magdalena
    Chalubinska, Justyna
    Kubiak, Robert
    Pawlowska, Zofia
    Blasinska-Morawiec, Maria
    Potemski, Piotr
    Jeziorski, Arkadiusz
    Morawiec, Zbigniew
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 39 (07) : 7435 - 7441
  • [23] Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Review
    Xu, Weilin
    Chen, Xiu
    Deng, Fei
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhang, Wei
    Tang, Jinhai
    [J]. ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2020, 13 : 5887 - 5899
  • [24] Gene expression and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Agnieszka Kolacinska
    Wojciech Fendler
    Janusz Szemraj
    Bozena Szymanska
    Ewa Borowska-Garganisz
    Magdalena Nowik
    Justyna Chalubinska
    Robert Kubiak
    Zofia Pawlowska
    Maria Blasinska-Morawiec
    Piotr Potemski
    Arkadiusz Jeziorski
    Zbigniew Morawiec
    [J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39 : 7435 - 7441
  • [25] Progress in Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer
    Gebreamlak, Estifanos P.
    Tse, Gary M. K.
    Niu, Yun
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 13 (02) : 222 - 226
  • [26] Tumor biology and tumor size are predictors of complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the National Cancer Database
    Livingston-Rosanoff, Devon
    Schumacher, Jessica
    Vande Walle, Kara
    Stankowski-Drengler, Trista
    Greenberg, Caprice
    Neuman, Heather
    Wilke, Lee
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 339 - 340
  • [27] Predictive markers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Tewari, Mallika
    Krishnamurthy, Arvind
    Shukla, Hari S.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2008, 17 (04): : 301 - 311
  • [28] Predictors of Response and Survival Outcomes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Zhu, Meizhen
    Yu, Yang
    Shao, Xiying
    Zhu, Liang
    Wang, Linbo
    [J]. CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 65 (3-4) : 101 - 109
  • [29] Risk factors of breast cancer recurrence in pathologic complete response achieved patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Choi, J. Y.
    Woen, D.
    Jang, S. Y.
    Lee, H.
    Shin, D. S.
    Kwak, Y.
    Chae, B. -J.
    Yu, J.
    Kim, S. W.
    Lee, J. E.
    Nam, S. J.
    Ryu, J. M.
    [J]. BREAST, 2023, 68 : S72 - S72
  • [30] The impact of tumor microenviroment on pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer
    Kuhar, C. Grasic
    Gazic, B.
    Ivancic, A. Klevisar
    Drev, P.
    Vetter, M. H. F.
    Kurzeder, C.
    Gersak, K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S611 - S611