共 50 条
False claims about false memory research
被引:54
|作者:
Wade, Kimberley A.
[1
]
Sharman, Stefanie J.
Garry, Maryanne
Memon, Amina
Mazzoni, Giuliana
Merckelbach, Harald
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
机构:
[1] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ New S Wales, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
[5] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[6] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
关键词:
false memory;
recovered memory;
misinformation;
DRM;
false childhood memories;
generalizing laboratory research;
D O I:
10.1016/j.concog.2006.07.001
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
Pezdek and Lam [Pezdek, K. & Lam, S. (2007). What research paradigms have cognitive psychologists used to study "False memory," and what are the implications of these choices? Consciousness and Cognition] claim that the majority of research into false memories has been misguided. Specifically, they charge that false memory scientists have been (1) misusing the term "false memory," (2) relying on the wrong methodologies to study false memories, and (3) misapplying false memory research to real world situations. We review each of these claims and highlight the problems with them. We conclude that several types of false memory research have advanced our knowledge of autobiographical and recovered memories, and that future research will continue to make significant contributions to how we understand memory and memory errors. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 28
页数:11
相关论文