Simple morphological spelling rules are not always used: Individual differences in children and adults

被引:5
|
作者
Kemp, Nenagh [1 ]
Mitchell, Paul [2 ]
Bryant, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Nottingham Trent Univ, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
KNOWLEDGE; CONTEXT; INSTRUCTION; DATABASE; DYSLEXIA; VOWELS; VERBS;
D O I
10.1017/S0142716417000042
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The English spelling system has a variety of rules and exceptions, but both theoretical and empirical accounts have generally concluded that by about age 9 or 10, children master the morphological rule that regular plural nouns (e.g., socks) and third-person singular present verbs (e.g., lacks) are spelled with the inflectional ending -s. In three experiments, however, we found that when forced to rely exclusively on morphological cues, only a minority of primary school children, secondary school children, and even adults performed significantly above chance at choosing the appropriate spelling for novel words presented as inflected or uninflected nouns and verbs. Further, significantly above-chance performance was more common in adults who had attended school until age 18, compared to age 16. We conclude that many spellers, especially those who do not go on to tertiary education, never learn some simple morphological spelling rules, and instead rely on a store of individual word-specific spellings.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1094
页数:24
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] How children learn about morphological spelling rules
    Chliounaki, Kalliopi
    Bryant, Peter
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 78 (04) : 1360 - 1373
  • [2] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF RULES IN READING, SPELLING, AND VOCABULARY
    BARON, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1981, 10 (05) : 524 - 524
  • [3] Morphological, phonological, and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults
    Worthy, J
    Viise, NM
    [J]. READING AND WRITING, 1996, 8 (02) : 139 - 159
  • [5] Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging
    Scheinost, Dustin
    Noble, Stephanie
    Horien, Corey
    Greene, Abigail S.
    Lake, Evelyn M. R.
    Salehi, Mehraveh
    Gao, Siyuan
    Shen, Xilin
    O'Connor, David
    Barron, Daniel S.
    Yip, Sarah W.
    Rosenberg, Monica D.
    Constable, R. Todd
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 193 : 35 - 45
  • [6] The Timing Tells the Tale: Multiple Morphological Processes in Children's and Adults' Spelling
    Breadmore, Helen L.
    Cote, Emily
    Deacon, S. Helene
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2023, 27 (05) : 408 - 427
  • [7] Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary
    Andrews, Sally
    Lo, Steson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 279 - 296
  • [8] READING ALOUD NONWORDS - SPELLING-SOUND CORRESPONDENCES USED BY CHILDREN AND ADULTS
    COLTHEART, V
    LEAHY, J
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 45 (02) : 111 - 111
  • [9] THE RULES USED BY CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN ATTEMPTING TO GENERATE RANDOM NUMBERS
    RABINOWITZ, FM
    DUNLAP, WP
    GRANT, MJ
    CAMPIONE, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 33 (03) : 227 - 287
  • [10] The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia
    van Witteloostuijn, Merel
    Boersma, Paul
    Wijnen, Frank
    Rispens, Judith
    [J]. DYSLEXIA, 2021, 27 (02) : 168 - 186