Comparison of single-stage and a two-stage vertical flow constructed wetland systems for different load scenarios

被引:31
|
作者
Langergraber, Guenter [1 ]
Pressl, Alexander [1 ]
Leroch, Klaus [2 ]
Rohrhofer, Roland [2 ]
Haberl, Raimund [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci, Inst Sanit Engn & Water Pollut Control, Vienna BOKU, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] OKOREAL GmbH, A-1170 Vienna, Austria
关键词
2-stage system; constructed wetland; standardized testing procedure; vertical flow; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2010.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are known to be robust wastewater treatment systems and are therefore very suitable for small villages and single households. When nitrification is required, vertical flow (VF) CWs are widely used. This contribution compares the behaviour and treatment efficiencies of a single-stage VF CW and a two-stage VF CW system under varying operating and loading conditions according to standardized testing procedures for small wastewater treatment plants as described in the European standard EN 12566-3. The single-stage VF CW is designed and operated according to the Austrian design standards with an organic load of 20 g COD m(-2) d(-1) (i.e. 4m(2) per person equivalent (PE)) The two-stage VF CW system is operated with 40 g COD m(-2) d(-1) (i.e. 2m(2) per PE). During the 48 week testing period the Austrian threshold effluent concentrations have not been exceeded in either system. The two-stage VF CW system showed to be more robust as compared to the single-stage VF CW especially during highly fluctuating loads at low temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1348
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Two-stage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Comparison to conventional single-stage mesophilic process
    Rusin, Jiri
    Chamradova, Katerina
    Basinas, Panagiotis
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 119 : 172 - 182
  • [42] Detection of sperm cells by single-stage and two-stage deep object detectors
    Yuzkat, Mecit
    Ilhan, Hamza Osman
    Aydin, Nizamettin
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2023, 83
  • [43] Outcomes of Single-Stage Compared to Two-Stage Basilic Vein Transposition Fistulae
    Agarwal, Amol
    Mantell, Mark
    Cohen, Raphael
    Yan, Yan
    Trerotola, Scott
    Clark, Timothy W.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2014, 27 (03) : 298 - 302
  • [44] Two-stage versus single-stage repair for severe hypospadias with moderate chordee
    Hassan, Mohamed E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 10 (04): : 125 - 129
  • [45] Two-Stage Versus Single-Stage Inventory Models with or without Repair Ability
    Bakal, Ismail Serdar
    Ozpamukcu, Serkan
    Bayindir, Pelin
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2012, 2014, : 555 - 560
  • [46] Comparison of two-stage and single-stage liquefaction schemes for their effect on conversion and liquid yield of two low rank coals
    Shen, Tao
    Liu, Qingya
    Liu, Zhenyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2023, 172
  • [47] Benchmarking of Single-Stage and Two-Stage Approaches for an MMC-Based BESS
    Dutra Gherard Pinto, Jonathan Hunder
    Silva Amorim, William Caires
    Cupertino, Allan Fagner
    Pereira, Heverton Augusto
    Seleme Junior, Seleme Isaac
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [48] Gain margin issues of the two-stage and single-stage LQ reliable controls
    Hsieh, CS
    Shieh, JJ
    [J]. 42ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 2471 - 2476
  • [49] Single-stage versus two-stage surgery of pulmonary and hepatic hydatid cysts
    Kabiri, El Hassane
    El Hammoumi, Massine
    Bhairis, Mohamed
    [J]. KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 18 (03) : 139 - 144
  • [50] Performance of a single stage vertical flow constructed wetland system treating raw domestic sewage in Brazil
    Lana, L. C. O.
    Moraes, D. C.
    von Sperling, M.
    Morato, M. L. N.
    Vasconcellos, G. R.
    Paraense, M. O.
    Moreira, T. P. A.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 68 (07) : 1599 - 1606