Risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive use in women with a family history of breast cancer

被引:135
|
作者
Gabrick, DM
Hartmann, LC
Cerhan, JR
Vierkant, RA
Therneau, TM
Vachon, CM
Olson, JE
Couch, FJ
Anderson, KE
Pankratz, VS
Sellers, TA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Med Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Biochem, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Mol Biol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Ctr Canc, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Ctr Canc, Rochester, MN USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.14.1791
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Oral contraceptive (OC) use is weakly associated with breast cancer risk in the general population, but the association among women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer is less clear. Objective To determine whether the association between OC use and risk of breast cancer is influenced by family history of the disease. Design and Setting Historical cohort study of 426 families of breast cancer probands diagnosed between 1944 and 1952 at the Tumor Clinic of the University of Minnesota Hospital. Follow-up data on families were collected by telephone interview between 1991 and 1996. Participants A total of 394 sisters and daughters of the probands, 3002 grand daughters and nieces, and 2754 women who married into the families. Main Outcome Measure Relative risk (RR) of breast cancer associated with history of OC use by relationship to proband. Results After accounting for age and birth cohort, ever having used OCs was associated with significantly increased risk of breast cancer among sisters and daughters of the probands (RR, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-6.7), but not among granddaughters and nieces of the probands (RR, 1.2, 95% CI, 0.8-2.0) or among marry-ins (RR, 1.2, 95% CI, 0.8-1.9). Results were essentially unchanged after adjustment for parity, age at first birth, age at menarche, age at menopause, oophorectomy, smoking, and education. The elevated risk among women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer was most evident for OC use during or prior to 1975, when formulations were likely to contain higher dosages of estrogen and progestins (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2). A small number of breast cancer cases (n = 2) limited the statistical power to detect risk among women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer and OC use after 1975. Conclusions These results suggest that women who have ever used earlier formulations of OCs and who also have a first-degree relative with breast cancer may be at particularly high risk for breast cancer. Further studies of women with a strong family history who have used more recent lower-dosage formulations of OCs are needed to determine how women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer should be advised regarding OC use today.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1798
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparisons of two breast cancer risk estimates in women with a family history of breast cancer
    McTiernan, A
    Kuniyuki, A
    Yasui, Y
    Bowen, D
    Burke, W
    Culver, JB
    Anderson, R
    Durfy, S
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2001, 10 (04) : 333 - 338
  • [32] RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN COPING WITH BREAST CANCER RISK IN WOMEN WITH A FAMILY HISTORY OF BREAST CANCER
    Michael, Julie C.
    Somers, Tamara J.
    Baum, Andrew
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 33 : S172 - S172
  • [33] Tea consumption and breast cancer risk in a cohort of women with family history of breast cancer
    Zhang, Dongyu
    Nichols, Hazel B.
    Troester, Melissa
    Cai, Jianwen
    Bensen, Jeannette T.
    Sandler, Dale P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 147 (03) : 876 - 886
  • [34] Adult Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Risk in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
    Niehoff, Nicole M.
    Nichols, Hazel B.
    Zhao, Shanshan
    White, Alexandra J.
    Sandler, Dale P.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2019, 28 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [35] The impact of reproductive factors and oral contraception on breast cancer risk in women with brca mutation or family history of breast cancer
    Toss, A.
    Grandi, G.
    Pavesi, S.
    Marcheselli, L.
    De Matteis, E.
    Razzaboni, E.
    Tomasello, C.
    Cagnacci, A.
    Cortesi, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [36] Oral contraceptive formulation and risk of breast cancer
    Marchbanks, Polly A.
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    Mandel, Michele G.
    Wilson, Hoyt G.
    Jeng, Gary
    Folger, Suzanne G.
    McDonald, Jill A.
    Daling, Janet R.
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Malone, Kathleen E.
    Wingo, Phyllis A.
    Simon, Michael S.
    Norman, Sandra A.
    Strom, Brian L.
    Ursin, Giske
    Weiss, Linda K.
    Burkman, Ronald T.
    Spirtas, Robert
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 85 (04) : 342 - 350
  • [37] Breast cancer increased risk on women using combined oral contraceptive
    Fenile, R.
    Nazario, A. C. P.
    Simoes, C. M.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [38] Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study of Young Women
    Hunter, David J.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    Malspeis, Susan
    Spiegelman, Donna
    Chen, Wendy
    Stampfer, Meir J.
    Willett, Walter C.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2496 - 2502
  • [39] Breast cancer and oral contraceptive use in Asian-American women
    Ursin, G
    Wu, AH
    Hoover, RN
    West, DW
    Nomura, AMY
    Kolonel, LN
    Pike, MC
    Ziegler, RG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 150 (06) : 561 - 567
  • [40] BENIGN BREAST DISEASE, ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE, AND THE RISK OF BREAST-CANCER
    LAVECCHIA, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1984, 37 (11): : 869 - 870