Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Ling, Zhenhao [2 ]
Deng, Xuejiao [1 ]
Deng, Tao [1 ]
Lyu, Xiaopu [3 ]
Li, Tingyuan [4 ]
Gao, Xiaorong [5 ]
Chen, Xi [6 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Trop & Marine Meteorol, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Prov Meteorol Bur, Ecol Meteorol Ctr, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Meteorol Observ, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
WRF; Community Multiscale Air Quality model; source contribution; unfavorable weather system; fine particulate matter; PEARL RIVER DELTA; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; HONG-KONG; OZONE FORMATION; SOUTHERN CHINA; HAZE EVENTS; VISIBILITY; AEROSOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Historical haze episodes (2013-16) in Guangzhou were examined and classified according to synoptic weather systems. Four types of weather systems were found to be unfavorable, among which "foreside of a cold front" (FC) and "sea high pressure" (SP) were the most frequent (> 75% of the total). Targeted case studies were conducted based on an FC-affected event and an SP-affected event with the aim of understanding the characteristics of the contributions of source regions to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Guangzhou. Four kinds of contributions-namely, emissions outside Guangdong Province (super-region), emissions from the Pearl River Delta region (PRD region), emissions from Guangzhou-Foshan-Shenzhen (GFS region), and emissions from Guangzhou (local)-were investigated using the Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Multiscale Air Quality model. The results showed that the source region contribution differed with different weather systems. SP was a stagnant weather condition, and the source region contribution ratio showed that the local region was a major contributor (37%), while the PRD region, GFS region and the super-region only contributed 8%, 2.8% and 7%, respectively, to PM2.5 concentrations. By contrast, FC favored regional transport. The super-region became noticeable, contributing 34.8%, while the local region decreased to 12%. A simple method was proposed to quantify the relative impact of meteorology and emissions. Meteorology had a 35% impact, compared with an impact of -18% for emissions, when comparing the FC-affected event with that of the SP. The results from this study can provide guidance to policymakers for the implementation of effective control strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1159
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China
    Nan Wang
    Zhenhao Ling
    Xuejiao Deng
    Tao Deng
    Xiaopu Lyu
    Tingyuan Li
    Xiaorong Gao
    Xi Chen
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2018, 35 : 1145 - 1159
  • [2] Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China
    Nan WANG
    Zhenhao LING
    Xuejiao DENG
    Tao DENG
    Xiaopu LYU
    Tingyuan LI
    Xiaorong GAO
    Xi CHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2018, 35 (09) : 1145 - 1159
  • [3] Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China
    Zheng, M
    Salmon, LG
    Schauer, JJ
    Zeng, LM
    Kiang, CS
    Zhang, YH
    Cass, GR
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (22) : 3967 - 3976
  • [4] Modeling Studies of Source Contributions to PM2.5 in Chengdu, China
    Xu Y.-L.
    Yi A.-H.
    Xue W.-B.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2020, 41 (01): : 50 - 56
  • [5] Spatial distribution and source contributions of PM2.5 concentrations in Jincheng, China
    Guo, Dongpeng
    Wang, Ran
    Zhao, Peng
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (08) : 1281 - 1289
  • [6] Seasonal and spatial differences in source contributions to PM2.5 in Wuhan, China
    Xiong, Ying
    Zhou, Jiabin
    Schauer, James J.
    Yu, Wenyang
    Hu, Yan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 577 : 155 - 165
  • [7] Long-term PM2.5 pollution over China: Identification of PM2.5 pollution hotspots and source contributions
    Ali, Md. Arfan
    Huang, Zhongwei
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Assiri, Mazen E.
    Mhawish, Alaa
    Nichol, Janet E.
    de Leeuw, Gerrit
    Almazroui, Mansour
    Wang, Yu
    Alsubhi, Yazeed
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 893
  • [8] Characterization of PM2.5 in Guangzhou, China: uses of organic markers for supporting source apportionment
    Wang, Jingzhi
    Ho, Steven Sai Hang
    Ma, Shexia
    Cao, Junji
    Dai, Wenting
    Liu, Suixin
    Shen, Zhenxing
    Huang, Rujin
    Wang, Gehui
    Han, Yongming
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 550 : 961 - 971
  • [9] City as a major source area of fine particulate (PM2.5) in China
    Han, Lijian
    Zhou, Weiqi
    Li, Weifeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2015, 206 : 183 - 187
  • [10] Source apportionment of PM2.5 pollution in an industrial city in southern China
    Zou, Bei-Bing
    Huang, Xiao-Feng
    Zhang, Bin
    Dai, Jing
    Zeng, Li-Wu
    Feng, Ning
    He, Ling-Yan
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 8 (06) : 1193 - 1202