Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes of Laser Therapy, Ultrasound Therapy, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:48
|
作者
Ulusoy, Aslihan [1 ,3 ]
Cerrahoglu, Lale [1 ]
Orguc, Sebnem [2 ]
机构
[1] Celal Bayar Univ, Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-45030 Uncubozkoy, Manisa, Turkey
[2] Celal Bayar Univ, Med Sch, Dept Radiodiagnost, Manisa, Turkey
[3] Urla State Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2017年 / 56卷 / 04期
关键词
heel pain; physical therapy; plantar fasciitis; HEEL PAIN; CONTROLLED MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We determined and compared the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT), therapeutic ultrasound (US) therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. A total of 60 patients with a diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into 3 treatment groups: group 1 underwent 15 sessions of LLLT (8 J/cm(2); 830 nm); group 2 underwent 15 sessions of continuous US (1 mHz; 2 W/cm(2)); and group 3 underwent 3 sessions of ESWT (2000 shocks). All patients were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), heel tenderness index (HTI), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, Roles-Maudsley score, and MRI before and 1 month after treatment. The primary efficacy success criterion was the percentage of decrease in heel pain of >60% from baseline at 1 month after treatment for >= 2 of the 3 heel pain (VAS) measurements. Significant improvement was measured using the mean VAS, AOFAS scale, and HTI scores for all 3 groups. The thickness of the plantar fascia had decreased significantly on MRI in all 3 groups. The treatment success rate was 70.6% in the LLLT group, 65% in the ESWT group, and 23.5% in the US group. LLLT and ESWT proved significantly superior to US therapy using the primary efficacy criterion (p = .006 and p = .012, respectively), with no significant difference between the LLLT and ESWT groups (p > .05). The treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with LLLT and ESWT resulted in similar outcomes and both were more successful than US therapy in pain improvement and functional outcomes. (C) 2017 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 767
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis
    Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Othman
    Ehab Mohamed Ragab
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2010, 130 : 1343 - 1347
  • [32] Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment: A randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical study
    Sanmak, Omur Damla Yinilmez
    Kulcu, Duygu Geler
    Mesci, Nilgun
    Altunok, Elif Cigdem
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 65 (02): : 184 - 190
  • [33] Myofascial points treatment with focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (f-ESWT) for plantar fasciitis: an open label randomized clinical trial
    Tognolo, Lucrezia
    Giordani, Federico
    Biz, Carlo
    Bernini, Andrea
    Ruggieri, Pietro
    Stecco, Carla
    Frigo, Anna C.
    Masiero, Stefano
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2022, 58 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [34] Comparison of effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and peloidotherapy in patients with plantar fasciitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Akdere, Emine
    Karpuz, Savas
    Yilmaz, Ramazan
    Akkurt, Halil Ekrem
    Yilmaz, Halim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2024,
  • [35] Clinically Relevant Effectiveness of Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis A Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study
    Gollwitzer, Hans
    Saxena, Amol
    DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
    Galli, Louis
    Bouche, Richard T.
    Caminear, David S.
    Fullem, Brian
    Vester, Johannes C.
    Horn, Carsten
    Banke, Ingo J.
    Burgkart, Rainer
    Gerdesmeyer, Ludger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (09): : 701 - 708
  • [36] RE: EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE THERAPY IN CHRONIC PLANTAR FASCIITIS
    Steffens, Daniel
    Maher, Chris G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2014, 93 (05) : 458 - 459
  • [37] RE: EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE THERAPY IN CHRONIC PLANTAR FASCIITIS
    Dizon, Jan Nathleen C.
    Gonzalez-Suarez, Consuelo
    Zamora, Marcelle Theresa G.
    Gambito, Ephraim D. V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2014, 93 (08) : 735 - 735
  • [38] The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on stroke patients with plantar fasciitis
    Kim, Tae Gon
    Bae, Sea Hyun
    Kim, Gye Yeop
    Kim, Kyung Yoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2015, 27 (02) : 523 - 526
  • [39] The cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis
    Marangos, PJ
    Seybold, P
    Papatheofanis, FJ
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (03) : A161 - A161
  • [40] Extracorporeal shock wave therapy no better than placebo in the treatment of plantar fasciitis - Commentary
    Waddington, G
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2003, 49 (01): : 69 - 69