Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Treats Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2/3 Among HIV- and HIV plus Women in Kenya

被引:1
|
作者
Mehta, Naaman [1 ]
Orang'o, Omenge [2 ]
Itsura, Peter [1 ]
Tonui, Philip [1 ]
Bussmann, Hermann [3 ]
Bogers, J. P. [4 ]
Liu, Tao [1 ]
Cu-Uvin, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Moi Univ, Eldoret, Kenya
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
cervical cancer; HIV; LEEP; Kenya; POSITIVE WOMEN; LESIONS; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; RECURRENCE; INFECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/LGT.0000000000000493
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to compare loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) as treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 in HIV- versus HIV+ women. Materials and Methods Seventy-five HIV- and 75 HIV+ women at 6 months or more after LEEP for CIN 2/3 were enrolled between September 2013 and November 2014 in this prospective cohort study at the cervical cancer screening clinic in Eldoret, Kenya. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), followed by cervical cytology with conventional cytology, was performed on all women. Women with positive VIA or abnormal cervical cytology underwent colposcopy/biopsy. Lesion progression, persistence, and regression were assessed to quantify the efficacy of LEEP. Results Post-loop electrosurgical excision procedure screening test showed both a negative VIA and normal cervical cytology in 64 (85%) of HIV- and 57 (77%) HIV+ women (risk difference = 8.3%, CI = -4.2% to 21%, p = .20). Eleven (15%) HIV- and 17 (23%) HIV+ (p = .20) women had positive VIA, abnormal cervical cytology, or both and were referred for colposcopy/biopsy. Twenty-one (8 HIV-, 13 HIV+) women were biopsied. Of the 8 HIV- women, 4 (50%) had CIN lesions that regressed, 3 (38.0%) persisted, and 1 (12%) progressed to invasive cancer after LEEP. Of the 13 HIV+ women, 6 (46%) had CIN lesions that regressed, 7 (54%) had CIN lesions that persisted, and no HIV+ women had CIN lesions that progressed after LEEP. There was no difference in estimated efficacies of LEEP for HIV- and HIV+ women (92.7% versus 89.4%, risk difference = 3.3%, CI = -4.8% to 15.3%, p = .85). Conclusions Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for CIN 2/3 is effective treatment for HIV- and HIV+ women in low-resource settings. Future efforts should improve follow-up after treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 26
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial lesions after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in HIV-infected and non-infected women
    de Miranda Lima, Maria Ines
    Melo, Victor Hugo
    Tafuri, Alexandre
    Labanca, Angela Cristina
    Lima, Luiza de Miranda
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2006, 28 (09): : 536 - 544
  • [32] Human papillomavirus testing following loop electrosurgical excision procedure identifies women at risk for posttreatment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 disease
    Kreimer, Aimee R.
    Guido, Richard S.
    Solomon, Diane
    Schiffman, Mark
    Wacholder, Sholom
    Jeronimo, Jose
    Wheeler, Cosette M.
    Castle, Philip E.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (05) : 908 - 914
  • [33] Impact of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on HIV-1 genital shedding: a prospective cohort study: population and statistical queries
    Black, M.
    Papathanasiou, A.
    Saraswat, L.
    Teoh, P. J.
    Woolner, A.
    McLernon, D. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (03) : 371 - 371
  • [34] Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
    Duesing, Nina
    Schwarz, Joerg
    Choschzick, Matthias
    Jaenicke, Fritz
    Gieseking, Friederike
    Issa, Rana
    Mahner, Sven
    Woelber, Linn
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (06) : 1549 - 1554
  • [35] Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
    Nina Duesing
    Joerg Schwarz
    Matthias Choschzick
    Fritz Jaenicke
    Friederike Gieseking
    Rana Issa
    Sven Mahner
    Linn Woelber
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 1549 - 1554
  • [36] Single visit approach for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection & loop electrosurgical excision procedure
    Singla, Shilpa
    Mathur, Sandeep
    Kriplani, Alka
    Agarwal, Nutan
    Garg, Pradeep
    Bhatla, Neerja
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 135 (05) : 614 - 620
  • [37] Outcome of Persistent Low-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treated With Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Gardella, Barbara
    Iacobone, Anna Daniela
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Cesari, Stefania
    Alberizzi, Paola
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2016, 20 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [38] Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo, AM
    VanDinh, T
    Hannigan, EV
    Yandell, RB
    Schnadig, VJ
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 41 (10) : 729 - 732
  • [39] Appropriate interval for repeat excision in women undergoing prior loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia
    Kietpeerakool, Chumnan
    Srisomboon, Jatupol
    Tiyayon, Jitima
    Ruengkhachorn, Irene
    Cheewakriangkrai, Chalong
    Suprasert, Prapaporn
    Pantusart, Aree
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2007, 8 (03) : 379 - 382
  • [40] Clinical predictors of residual disease in hysterectomy following a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3
    Qing Wu
    Yu Jiang
    Jun Ding
    Lihua Xia
    Haiou Xu
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22