Care Coordination for Vulnerable Families in the Sydney Local Health District: What Works for Whom, under What Circumstances, and Why?

被引:12
|
作者
Eastwood, John G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Dewhurst, Suzannah [1 ]
Hansen, Sally [6 ]
Tennant, Elaine [6 ]
Miller, Erin [6 ]
Moensted, Maja Lindegaard [7 ]
Fotheringham, Penelope [6 ]
De Souza, Denise [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Discipline Child & Adolescent Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Sydney Inst Women Children & Their Families, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[6] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Community Hlth Serv, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[7] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Drug Hlth Serv, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[8] Torrens Univ Australia, Ctr Res Educ CRED, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE | 2020年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
integrated care; critical realism; care coordination; disadvantaged families; evaluation; CHILD;
D O I
10.5334/ijic.5437
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Healthy Homes and Neighbourhoods (HHAN), an integrated care programme in the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD), seeks to address the needs of disadvantaged families through care coordination, as one of its components. This research aims to determine for whom, when and why the care coordination component of HHAN works, and establish the reported outcomes for clients, service-providers and partner organisations. Methods: Critical realist methodology was utilised to undertake a qualitative evaluation of the impact of care coordination. Purposive sampling was used to select a total of 37 participants for interview, including consumers, service-providers and key stakeholders. Thematic analysis was undertaken to derive the major modes of intervention of HHAN, and data representing these elements was coded and summarised under contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Results: Analysis indicates that care coordination has a positive impact on clients' sense of independence, self-awareness and outlook on life. Trust and favourable interpersonal relations were identified as major underlying mechanisms for a successful client-provider working relationship. The identified modes of intervention facilitating positive consumer outcomes included accessibility, flexibility and service navigation. Persistent siloes in health and systemic resistance to collaboration was seen to hinder effective care delivery. Conclusions: This study suggests that a care coordination model may be effective in engaging disadvantaged families in healthcare, assist them in navigating the health system and can lead to beneficial health and social outcomes. Successful implementation of care coordination requires flexible programme design and experienced and skilful clinicians to fulfil the care coordinator role. There is a need to appreciate the negative impact that the complex and siloed health system can have on disadvantaged families.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RCTs of complex interventions in mental health care: what works for whom?
    Puschner, B.
    Slade, M.
    PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 2011, 38
  • [32] Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for common mental health disorders, what works, for whom under what circumstances? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grist R.
    Cavanagh K.
    Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 2013, 43 (4) : 243 - 251
  • [33] Meeting personal rehabilitation needs in arm rehabilitation after stroke: exploring what works for whom, under what circumstances and how?
    van Wijck, F.
    Kidd, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 79 - 80
  • [34] What works, why and for whom when implementing programs in primary care and community settings?
    Coates, Sonia
    Evans, Kerrie
    Ashton-James, Claire
    Boyle, Eileen
    Beales, Darren
    Kang, Kwangil
    Rebbeck, Trudy
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18
  • [35] Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how
    Rayment-Jones, Hannah
    Silverio, Sergio A.
    Harris, James
    Harden, Angela
    Sandall, Jane
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 84
  • [36] Doing palliative care research on hematologic cancer patients: A realist synthesis of literature and experts' opinion on what works, for whom and in what circumstances
    Tanzi, Silvia
    Martucci, Gianfranco
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [37] Interprofessional education for healthcare professionals. A BEME realist review of what works, why, for whom and in what circumstances in undergraduate health sciences education: BEME Guide No. 83
    Krystallidou, Demi
    Kersbergen, Maria J.
    de Groot, Esther
    Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G.
    Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske
    Mertens, Fien
    Oosterbaan-Lodder, Saskia C. M.
    Scherpbier, Nynke
    Versluis, Marco A. C.
    Pype, Peter
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2024, 46 (12) : 1607 - 1624
  • [38] Understanding for whom, why and in what circumstances payment for performance works in low and middle income countries: protocol for a realist review
    Borghi, Josephine
    Singh, Neha S.
    Brown, Garrett
    Anselmi, Laura
    Kristensen, Soren
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (03):
  • [39] Health Care Reform: What It Is, Why It's Necessary, How It Works
    Connolly, Ceci
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (05) : 1122 - 1123
  • [40] Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
    van Hees, Suzanne G. M.
    Carlier, Bouwine E.
    Blonk, Roland W. B.
    Oomens, Shirley
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2021, 69 (03): : 827 - 838