A comparison of two digestion methods and heavy metals determination in sediments

被引:0
|
作者
Nnodum, Chima F. [1 ]
Yusuf, Kafeelah A. [1 ]
Wusu, Adedoja D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lagos State Univ, Dept Chem, Ojo, Nigeria
[2] Lagos State Univ, Dept Biochem, Ojo, Nigeria
关键词
Atomic absorption spectrophotometer; digestion; heavymetals; pollution; sediment; POLLUTION; WATER; MALAYSIA;
D O I
10.1515/psr-2021-0194
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to evaluate the levels of heavy metal concentrations in sediments and also involves a comparison of two different digestion protocols. The first digestion procedure was done with a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid while the second digestion method was done using the United States Environmental Protection Agency method 3052 which comprises nitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrochloric acid, and hydrogen peroxide. The sediment samples were analyzed for cadmium, copper, iron, lead, zinc, chromium, manganese, nickel (Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn Cr, Mn, and Ni) with the aid of atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Concentrations of metals ranged 0-7.0 mg/kg for Cr, 0.5-20.0 mg/kg for Cd, 10.8-112.0 mg/kg for Fe, 0.10-7.20 mg/kg for Pb, 45.69-184.96 mg/kg for Cu, 1.0-73.75 mg/kg for Zn, 1.5-19.7 mg/kg for Mn and nd -3.0 mg/kg for Ni. The order of concentrations of the metals in the samples are Cu > Fe > Zn > Cd > Mn > Pb > Cr > Ni. The second digestion method yielded higher levels of metal concentration. Comparison with theWorld Health Organization (W.H.O) standards for marine sediments showed that the average concentrations of heavy metals were within the permissible limits. Close monitoring and more publicity are further needed to discourage further pollution of the area.
引用
收藏
页码:4233 / 4251
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DETERMINATION OF HEAVY-METALS IN ESTUARINE SEDIMENTS BY ACID DIGESTION AND ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY
    BELLO, MA
    CALLEJON, M
    JIMENEZ, JC
    PABLOS, F
    TERNERO, M
    TOXICOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 44 (3-4): : 203 - 210
  • [23] The comparability of sample digestion techniques for the determination of metals in sediments
    Cook, JM
    Gardner, MJ
    Griffiths, AH
    Jessep, MA
    Ravenscroft, JE
    Yates, R
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1997, 34 (08) : 637 - 644
  • [24] Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimating heavy metals in sediments of Caspian Sea
    Kazemi, S. M.
    Hosseini, S. M.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1632 - 1649
  • [25] DETERMINATION OF HEAVY-METALS IN PAPERS - A COMPARISON OF METHODS (SOLID SAMPLING AND DIGESTION ANALYSIS BY MEANS OF GRAPHITE TUBE AAS
    KNEZEVIC, G
    KURFURST, U
    FRESENIUS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANALYTISCHE CHEMIE, 1985, 322 (07): : 717 - 718
  • [26] WET DIGESTION VERSUS SIMPLER METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF HEAVY-METALS IN FISH OILS
    ACKMAN, RG
    ELSON, CM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1981, 58 (07) : A580 - A580
  • [27] COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR DETERMINATION BY ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMETRY OF HEAVY-METALS IN SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
    DIAZBARRIENTOS, E
    MADRID, L
    CABRERA, F
    CONTRERAS, MC
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1991, 22 (15-16) : 1559 - 1568
  • [28] Comparison of selected methods used in the assessment of contamination with heavy metals in littoral sediments of lakes
    Dunalska, Julita A.
    Gusiatin, Zygmunt M.
    Zielinski, Rafal
    Szymanski, Daniel
    Sienska, Justyna
    OCEANOLOGICAL AND HYDROBIOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2016, 45 (04) : 493 - 504
  • [29] Precision Methods in the Determination of the Heavy Metals
    Fairhall, Lawrence T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE NATIONS HEALTH, 1938, 28 (07): : 825 - 831
  • [30] Comparison of two methods on the determination on contact voltage between metals
    Moench, Guenther
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK, 1930, 65 (3-4): : 233 - 243