Knowledge Sharing by Students: Preference for Online Discussion Board vs Face-to-Face Class Participation

被引:0
|
作者
Majid, Shaheen [1 ]
Pan Yang [1 ]
Huang Lei [1 ]
Guo Haoran [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
Online Discussion Boards; Face-to-Face Sharing; Knowledge Sharing; Post-graduate Students; Singapore;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate students' preference for participation in face-to-face and online discussions, and the factors that can either motivate or pose barriers to knowledge sharing. A questionnaire was used for data collection and 149 post-graduate students from two public universities in Singapore participated in this study. It was found that a majority (82.5%) of the students preferred in-class face-to-face discussions for knowledge sharing and a majority of them agreed that the factors such as encouragement by instructors, challenging discussion topics, and thought provoking questions from instructors and classmates were likely to motivate them to participate. The motivating factors for participation in online discussions were: more time to refine ideas, less nervousness, and flexible access to online discussion boards. The major barriers to face-to-face participation were shyness and uninteresting topics. On the other hand, the major hurdles to online discussions were unfriendly interface and time constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Study on the Factors Influencing the Participation of Face-to-Face Discussion and Online Synchronous Discussion in Class
    Zhao, Lixin
    Shen, Xiaoxia
    Hwang, Wu-Yuin
    Shih, Timothy K.
    [J]. INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS (ITS 2020), 2020, 12149 : 184 - 195
  • [2] UniVResity: Face-to-Face Class Participation for Remote Students using Virtual Reality
    Pietroszek, Krzysztof
    Lin, Chao Cheng
    [J]. 25TH ACM SYMPOSIUM ON VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY (VRST 2019), 2019,
  • [3] Sensing Behaviors of Students in Online vs. Face-to-Face Lecturing Contexts
    Medina, Rebecca
    Carpenter, Daniel
    Geigel, Joe
    Bailey, Reynold
    Wang, Linwei
    Alm, Cecilia O.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 2018,
  • [4] Middle School Students' Mathematics Knowledge Retention: Online or Face-to-Face Environments
    Edwards, Clayton M.
    Rule, Audrey C.
    Boody, Robert M.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2017, 20 (04): : 1 - 10
  • [5] Characteristics of the discussion in online and face-to-face focus groups
    Schneider, SJ
    Kerwin, J
    Frechtling, J
    Vivari, BA
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2002, 20 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [6] Influence of Online and Face-to-Face Wellness Courses on Exercise Participation
    Keefer, Daniel. J.
    Lombardi, Julie A.
    Nesbitt, Gordon M.
    Schaeffer, Stratton C.
    Wimer, Jeffrey W.
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2009, 80 (01) : A29 - A29
  • [7] Participation Style of ESL Learners in Face-to-face and Online Discussions
    Chew, Shin-Yi
    Ng, Lee-Luan
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF ELT RESEARCH, 2015, 11 (02): : 68 - 81
  • [8] Online Synchronous Discussion in Face-to-Face Classroom Based on WeChat
    Lu, Manli
    Chen, Guang
    Ouyang, Shuxian
    [J]. 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION (ICCE 2017): TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION: COMPUTER-BASED EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 2017, : 576 - 585
  • [9] Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion?
    Guiller, Jane
    Dumdell, Alan
    Ross, Anne
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2008, 18 (02) : 187 - 200
  • [10] Face-to-face vs. Online learning in Engineering Courses
    Guadalupe Garcia-Castelan, Rosa Maria
    Gonzalez-Nucamendi, Andres
    Robledo-Rella, Victor
    Neri, Luis
    Noguez, Julieta
    [J]. 2021 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2021), 2021,