Characteristics of the discussion in online and face-to-face focus groups

被引:88
|
作者
Schneider, SJ [1 ]
Kerwin, J [1 ]
Frechtling, J [1 ]
Vivari, BA [1 ]
机构
[1] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
focus group; cyberspace; online research;
D O I
10.1177/089443930202000104
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Focus groups are widely used in qualitative research. Recently, focus groups that are held online have become increasingly popular despite the objection by some researchers that the Internet is a poor medium for focus group research. The present study was conducted to reveal differences in the characteristics of focus group discussions in the online and face-to-face formats. Participants in 4 online focus groups and 4 face-to-face focus groups discussed their opinions about several health-related Web sites. Statistical analysis of the transcripts suggested that online participants tended to contribute shorter comments and were more likely to say just a few words of agreement. In the online focus groups, participation levels tended to be more uniform; in the face-to-face groups, some participants tended to contribute a disproportionately large number of words, whereas other participants were relatively silent. The results suggest different roles for online and face-to-face focus groups in qualitative research.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:31 / 42
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Information Retrieval in Face-To-Face and Online Focus Groups. A Systematic Review
    Chai, C. A.
    Barrios, M.
    Gomez-Benito, J.
    Berrio, A. I.
    Guilera, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2024, 23
  • [2] A Literature Review of Studies that Have Compared the Use of Face-To-Face and Online Focus Groups
    Jones, Janet E.
    Jones, Laura L.
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    Damery, Sarah L.
    Mathers, Jonathan M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2022, 21
  • [3] A Preliminary Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Process Groups
    Holmes, Courtney M.
    Kozlowski, Kelly A.
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES, 2015, 33 (03) : 241 - 262
  • [4] Advantages of asynchronous online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups as perceived by child, adolescent and adult participants: A survey study
    Zwaanswijk M.
    Van Dulmen S.
    BMC Research Notes, 7 (1)
  • [5] Shifting Focus: from books to laptops to face-to-face discussion
    Heim, Michael
    POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 2009, 7 (06): : 607 - 614
  • [6] Online Synchronous Discussion in Face-to-Face Classroom Based on WeChat
    Lu, Manli
    Chen, Guang
    Ouyang, Shuxian
    25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION (ICCE 2017): TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION: COMPUTER-BASED EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 2017, : 576 - 585
  • [7] Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion?
    Guiller, Jane
    Dumdell, Alan
    Ross, Anne
    LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2008, 18 (02) : 187 - 200
  • [8] Males are not as active as females in online discussion: Gender differences in face-to-face and online discussion strategies
    Tsai, Meng-Jung
    Liang, Jyh-Chong
    Hou, Huei-Tse
    Tsai, Chin-Chung
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 31 (03) : 263 - 277
  • [9] Determinants of Engagement in Face-to-Face and Online Patient Support Groups
    Van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.
    Drossaert, Constance H. C.
    Taal, Erik
    Smit, Willem M.
    Moens, Hein J. Bernelot
    Van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04)
  • [10] An experimental comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face focus groups
    Underhill, C
    Olmsted, MG
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2003, 21 (04) : 506 - 512