Comparison of Bagging, Boosting and Stacking Ensembles Applied to Real Estate Appraisal

被引:0
|
作者
Graczyk, Magdalena [1 ]
Lasota, Tadeusz [2 ]
Trawinski, Bogdan [1 ]
Trawinski, Krzysztof [3 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Inst Informat, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Wroclaw Univ Environm & Life Sci, Dept Spatial Management, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
[3] Edificio Cientifico Tecnol, European Ctr Soft Comp, Mieres 33600, Spain
关键词
ensemble models; bagging; stacking; boosting; property valuation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The experiments, aimed to compare three methods to create ensemble models implemented in a popular data mining system called WEKA, were carried out. Six common algorithms comprising two neural network algorithms, two decision trees for regression, linear regression, and support vector machine were used to construct ensemble models. All algorithms were employed to real-world datasets derived from the cadastral system and the registry of real estate transactions. Nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to evaluate the differences between ensembles and original models were conducted. The results obtained show there is no single algorithm which produces the best ensembles and it is worth to seek an optimal hybrid multi-model solution.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real estate surfaces appraisal
    Ciuna, Marina
    Simonotti, Marco
    AESTIMUM, 2014, 64 : 1 - 13
  • [22] Performance of global–local hybrid ensemble versus boosting and bagging ensembles
    Dustin Baumgartner
    Gursel Serpen
    International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2013, 4 : 301 - 317
  • [23] Estimation and comparison of gabion weir oxygen mass transfer by ensemble learnings of bagging, boosting, and stacking algorithms
    Luxmi K.M.
    Tiwari N.K.
    Ranjan S.
    ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2023, 29 (sup1) : 196 - 211
  • [24] A case study on bagging, boosting, and basic ensembles of neural networks for OCR
    Mao, JC
    IEEE WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 1998, : 1828 - 1833
  • [25] Comparison of different machine learning models for mass appraisal of real estate
    Bilgilioglu, Suleyman Sefa
    Yilmaz, Haci Murat
    SURVEY REVIEW, 2023, 55 (388) : 32 - 43
  • [26] COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR MASS APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE DATA
    Sevgen, Sibel Canaz
    Tanrivermis, Yesim
    REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT AND VALUATION, 2024, 32 (02) : 100 - 111
  • [27] Real Estate Mass Appraisal in the Real Estate Cadastre and GIS Environment
    Brankovic, Stojanka
    GEODETSKI LIST, 2013, 67 (02) : 119 - 134
  • [28] Comparison of Expert Algorithms with Machine Learning Models for Real Estate Appraisal
    Trawinski, Bogdan
    Telec, Zbigniew
    Krasnoborski, Jacek
    Piwowarczyk, Mateusz
    Talaga, Michal
    Lasota, Tedeusz
    Sawilow, Edward
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (INISTA), 2017, : 51 - 54
  • [29] Performance of global-local hybrid ensemble versus boosting and bagging ensembles
    Baumgartner, Dustin
    Serpen, Gursel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2013, 4 (04) : 301 - 317
  • [30] The appraisal smoothing in the real estate indeces
    Ciuna, Marina
    D'Amato, Maurizio
    Salvo, Francesca
    EVOLUZIONE DEI VALORI FONDIARI E POLITICHE AGRICOLE, 2013, : 73 - 83