Diagnostic Performance of PET/CT Using 18F-FACBC in Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Bin, Xu [1 ]
Yong, Shan [2 ]
Kong, Qing-Fang [3 ]
Zhao, Sun [1 ]
Zhang, Guang-Yuan [1 ]
Wu, Jian-Ping [1 ]
Chen, Shu-Qiu [1 ]
Zhu, Wei-Dong [1 ]
Pan, Ke-Hao [1 ]
Du, Mu-Long [4 ,5 ]
Chen, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Dept Urol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Second Peoples Hosp Taizhou, Taizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Dept Nosocomial Infect, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Personalized Med, Dept Environm Genom, Jiangsu Key Lab Canc Biomarkers Prevent & Treatme, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Global Hlth, Dept Biostat, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 9卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prostate cancer; PET; CT; 18F-fluciclovine(FACBC); meta-analysis; ACID; BIOMARKER; ASCT2;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2019.01438
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnostic performance of PET/CT using 18F-fluciclovine (18F-FACBC) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) has been evaluated in only a few studies. There is no consensus on the diagnostic value of 18F-FACBC PET/CT in PCa recurrence or metastasis (except for bone metastasis), the primary diagnosis of the lesion. Hence, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of 18F-FACBC PET/CT. Methods: The literature published from June 2015 to June 2019 on using 18F-FACBC PET/CT for the diagnosis of PCa was retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE. Pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 18F-FACBC PET/CT in patients with PCa were calculated. An SROC map was made, and a meta-regression analysis was carried out. A Fagan plot and likelihood ratio dot plot were drawn. Sensitivity and funnel plot analysis were made. Meta-disc, Review Manager 5.3, and STATA 13 were used for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of nine articles met the strict criteria for diagnostic meta-analysis, which included 363 patients and 345 lesions. Pooled Sen, Spe, LR+, LR-, DOR were 0.88, 0.73, 3.3, 0.17, and 20, respectively. Lesions detected on the PET/CT image included primary lesions and metastases. For the lesion, the doctors considered the abnormal part as a lesion on the PET/CT image by their own experience and expertise, including primary lesions and metastases. For the patient, patients who participated in the trial can be diagnosed as PCa through 18F-FACBC. Conclusion: This study comprehensively evaluated the diagnostic value of 18F-FACBC PET/CT on PCa. Our analysis suggests that 18F-FACBC PET/CT is a valuable agent in diagnosing PCa. More studies are needed for further validation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Correction to: 18F-Fluciclovine (18F-FACBC) PET imaging of recurrent brain tumors
    Laure Michaud
    B. J. Beattie
    T. Akhurst
    M. Dunphy
    P. Zanzonico
    R. Finn
    A. Mauguen
    H. Schöder
    W. A. Weber
    A. B. Lassman
    R. Blasberg
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2020, 47 (1) : 4 - 4
  • [32] Prospective evaluation of 18F-FACBC PET/CT and PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients (FLUCIPRO trial)
    Ivan Jambor
    Anna Kuisma
    Esa Kähkönen
    Jukka Kemppainen
    Harri Merisaari
    Olli Eskola
    Jarmo Teuho
    Ileana Montoya Perez
    Marko Pesola
    Hannu J. Aronen
    Peter J. Boström
    Pekka Taimen
    Heikki Minn
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2018, 45 : 355 - 364
  • [33] Diagnostic performance of 18F-choline PET-CT in prostate cancer
    Samper Ots, P.
    Luis Cardo, A.
    Vallejo Ocana, C.
    Cabeza Rodriguez, M. A.
    Glaria Enriquez, L. A.
    Couselo Paniagua, M. L.
    Olivera Vegas, J.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (06): : 766 - 773
  • [34] Diagnostic performance of 18F-choline PET-CT in prostate cancer
    P. Samper Ots
    A. Luis Cardo
    C. Vallejo Ocaña
    M. A. Cabeza Rodríguez
    L. A. Glaria Enríquez
    M. L. Couselo Paniagua
    J. Olivera Vegas
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2019, 21 : 766 - 773
  • [35] The diagnostic performance of 18F-fluoride PET/CT in bone metastases detection: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Y.
    Sheng, J.
    Dong, Z.
    Xu, Y.
    Huang, Q.
    Pan, D.
    Wang, L.
    Yang, M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (03) : 196 - 206
  • [36] Prospective evaluation of 18F-FACBC PET/CT and PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients (FLUCIPRO trial)
    Jambor, Ivan
    Kuisma, Anna
    Kahkonen, Esa
    Kemppainen, Jukka
    Merisaari, Harri
    Eskola, Olli
    Teuho, Jarmo
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Pesola, Marko
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Taimen, Pekka
    Minn, Heikki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 (03) : 355 - 364
  • [37] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
    Wang, Hsin-Yi
    Ding, Hueisch-Jy
    Chen, Jin-Hua
    Chao, Chih-Hao
    Lu, Yu-Yu
    Lin, Wan-Yu
    Kao, Chia-Hung
    CANCER IMAGING, 2012, 12 (03): : 464 - 474
  • [38] Localized Prostate Cancer Detection with 18F FACBC PET/CT: Comparison with MR Imaging and Histopathologic Analysis
    Turkbey, Baris
    Mena, Esther
    Shih, Joanna
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Lindenberg, Maria L.
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    McKinney, Yolanda L.
    Adler, Stephen
    Owenius, Rikard
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Kurdziel, Karen A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (03) : 849 - 856
  • [39] Diagnostic value of [18F] FDG-PET and PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Huojun
    Xing, Wei
    Kang, Qinqin
    Chen, Chao
    Wang, Linhui
    Lu, Jianping
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) : 3209 - 3214
  • [40] The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Rang
    Shen, Guohua
    Huang, Mingxing
    Tian, Rong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11