Distinct activities of the related protein kinases Cdk1 and Ime2

被引:10
|
作者
Sawarynski, Kara E.
Kaplun, Alexander
Tzivion, Guri
Brush, George S.
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Barbara Ann Karmanoso Canc Inst, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
来源
关键词
cyclin-dependent kinase; G1; cyclin; meiosis; phosphorylation; replication protein A; Sic1;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In budding yeast, commitment to DNA replication during the normal cell cycle requires degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor Sic1. The G1 cyclin-CDK complexes Cln1-Cdk1 and Cln2-Cdk1 initiate the process of Sic1 removal by directly catalyzing Sic1 phosphorylation at multiple sites. Commitment to DNA replication during meiosis also appears to require Sicl degradation, but the G1 cyclin-CDK complexes are not involved. It has been proposed that the meiosis-specific protein kinase Ime2 functionally replaces the G1 cyclin-CDK complexes to promote Sic1 destruction. To investigate this possibility, we compared Cln2-Cdk1 and Ime2 protein kinase activities in vitro. Both enzyme preparations were capable of catalyzing phosphorylation of a GST-Sic1 fusion protein, but the phosphoisomers generated by the two activities had significantly different electrophoretic mobilities. Furthermore, mutation of consensus CDK phosphorylation sites in Sic1 affected Cln2-Cdk1- but not Ime2-dependent phosphorylation. Phosphoamino acid analysis and phosphopeptide mapping provided additional evidence that Cln2-Cdk1 and Ime2 targeted different residues within Sic1. Examination of other substrates both in vitro and in vivo also revealed differing specificities. These results indicate that Ime2 does not simply replace G1 cyclin-CDK complexes in promoting Sic1 degradation during meiosis. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 456
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Yeast as a model system to screen purine derivatives against human CDK1 and CDK2 kinases
    Mayi, Therese
    Facca, Celine
    Anne, Sandrine
    Vernis, Laurence
    Huang, Meng-Er
    Legraverend, Michel
    Faye, Gerard
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 30 - 36
  • [12] Cdk1 and Cdk2 complexes (cyclin dependent kinases) in apoptosis: a role beyond the cell cycle
    Golsteyn, RM
    CANCER LETTERS, 2005, 217 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [13] Control of landmark events in meiosis by the CDK Cdc28 and the meiosis-specific kinase Ime2
    Benjamin, KR
    Zhang, C
    Shokat, KM
    Herskowitz, I
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 17 (12) : 1524 - 1539
  • [14] Correlation between CDK1 protein and CDK1 mRNA during oocyte maturation in vivo in mouse
    Sun, Ya-Ting
    Zhu, Ai-Zhen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 66 (4-6): : 305 - 309
  • [15] CDK-related protein kinases in plants
    Joubès, J
    Chevalier, C
    Dudits, D
    Heberle-Bors, E
    Inzé, D
    Umeda, M
    Renaudin, JP
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 43 (5-6) : 607 - 620
  • [16] CDK-related protein kinases in plants
    Jérôme Joubès
    Christian Chevalier
    Denes Dudits
    Erwin Heberle-Bors
    Dirk Inzé
    Masaaki Umeda
    Jean-Pierre Renaudin
    Plant Molecular Biology, 2000, 43 : 607 - 620
  • [17] CDK1 couples proliferation with protein synthesis
    Haneke, Katharina
    Schott, Johanna
    Lindner, Doris
    Hollensen, Anne Kruse
    Damgaard, Christian Kroun
    Mongis, Cyril
    Knop, Michael
    Palm, Wilhelm
    Ruggieri, Alessia
    Stoecklin, Georg
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2020, 219 (03):
  • [18] Inhibition of APC-mediated proteolysis by the meiosis-specific protein kinase Ime2
    Bolte, M
    Steigemann, P
    Braus, GH
    Irniger, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (07) : 4385 - 4390
  • [19] Cdk1: the dominant sibling of Cdk2
    Bashir, T
    Pagano, M
    NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2005, 7 (08) : 779 - 781
  • [20] Cdk1: the dominant sibling of Cdk2
    Tarig Bashir
    Michele Pagano
    Nature Cell Biology, 2005, 7 : 779 - 781