Inherently safer design review and their timing during chemical process development and design

被引:40
|
作者
Kidam, Kamarizan [1 ,2 ]
Sahak, Haslinda A. [1 ]
Hassim, Mimi H. [1 ,2 ]
Shahlan, Siti S. [1 ]
Hurme, Markku [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Future Energy, Ctr Hydrogen Energy, Utm Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Dept Chem Engn, Utm Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
[3] Aalto Univ, Dept Biotechnol & Chem Technol, POB 16100, Aalto 00076, Finland
关键词
Accident analysis; Design errors; Process lifecycle; Inherent safety; Review criteria; ISD timing; INDEX; TOOL; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2015.09.016
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the enhancement of inherent safety review and its implementation in the chemical process development and design. The aim is to update and improve the existing inherently safer design review (ISDR) practices during design of chemical process plant by exploiting major accident cases from the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) and Failure Knowledge Database (FKD). Although the basic guidelines to conduct ISDR during design phase are available, however they are too general and incomplete. The review criteria and their best timing for application are still missing. This paper attempts to develop the accident-based ISDR for chemical process plant design. The proposed accident-based ISDR is supported with detail review criteria for each phase of process design. The timing of ISDR application is corresponding to the common design tasks and decisions made in the design project. Therefore, timely design review could be done at the specific design task and the findings help designer to make a correct decision making. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 58
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How to perform inherently safer design
    不详
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2008, 104 (05) : 7 - 7
  • [42] Inherently safer design - Present and future
    Gupta, J.P.
    Edwards, D.W.
    [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2002, 80 (03) : 115 - 125
  • [43] Inherently safer process route ranking index (ISPRRI) for sustainable process design
    Athar, Muhammad
    Shariff, Azmi Mohd
    Buang, Azizul
    Umer, Asim
    Zaini, Dzulkarnain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 80
  • [44] Inherently Safer Design for low-temperature process during depressurization: An industrial case study
    Surmi, Amiza
    Ismail, Muhammad Heikal
    Radiah, Dayang
    Cozzani, Valerio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2020, 68
  • [45] Inherently safer design through information sharing
    McAlinden, LP
    Norman, PW
    Sitoh, PJ
    [J]. 1997 JUBILEE RESEARCH EVENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 673 - 676
  • [46] A decision support database for inherently safer design
    Srinivasan, R
    Chia, KC
    Heikkila, AM
    Schabel, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING - 13, 2003, 14 : 287 - 292
  • [47] Implementing inherently safer design in an existing plant
    Hendershot, DC
    Sussman, JA
    Winkler, GE
    Dill, GL
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2006, 25 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [48] Inherently safer design principles are proven in expansions
    McCarthy, AJ
    Miller, UR
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1997, 76 (04): : 122 - 125
  • [49] Inherently safer design - Its scope and future
    Kletz, TA
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2003, 81 (B6) : 401 - 405
  • [50] Inherently Safer Design Applied to the Biodiesel Production
    Gomez, German E.
    Ramos, Manuel A.
    Cadena, Jaime E.
    Gomez, Jorge M.
    Munoz, Felipe
    [J]. LP2013 - 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON LOSS PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROMOTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, VOLS I AND II, 2013, 31 : 619 - 624