Water Footprint, Blue Water Scarcity, and Economic Water Productivity of Irrigated Crops in Peshawar Basin, Pakistan

被引:19
|
作者
Khan, Tariq [1 ,2 ]
Nouri, Hamideh [3 ]
Booij, Martijn J. [4 ]
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. [4 ]
Khan, Hizbullah [2 ]
Ullah, Ihsan [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haripur, Dept Environm Sci, Haripur 22620, Pakistan
[2] Univ Peshawar, Dept Environm Sci, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
[3] Univ Gottingen, Div Agron, Von Siebold Str 8, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Twente, Dept Water Engn & Management, Fac Engn Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Univ Peshawar, Dept Geog, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
关键词
green water footprint; blue water footprint; canal irrigated crops; water scarcity; economic water productivity; Pakistan; RIVER-BASIN; GREEN; AVAILABILITY; AGRICULTURE; SUSTAINABILITY; VARIABILITY; CONSUMPTION; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; SOILS;
D O I
10.3390/w13091249
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pakistan possesses the fourth largest irrigation network in the world, serving 20.2 million hectares of cultivated land. With an increasing irrigated area, Pakistan is short of freshwater resources and faces severe water scarcity and food security challenges. This is the first comprehensive study on the water footprint (WF) of crop production in Peshawar Basin. WF is defined as the volume of freshwater required to produce goods and services. In this study, we assessed the blue and green water footprints (WFs) and annual blue and green water consumption of major crops (maize, rice, tobacco, wheat, barley, sugarcane, and sugar beet) in Peshawar Basin, Pakistan. The Global Water Footprint Assessment Standard (GWFAS) and AquaCrop model were used to model the daily WF of each crop from 1986 to 2015. In addition, the blue water scarcity, in the context of available surface water, and economic water productivity (EWP) of these crops were assessed. The 30 year average blue and green WFs of major crops revealed that maize had the highest blue and green WFs (7077 and 2744 m(3)/ton, respectively) and sugarcane had the lowest blue and green WFs (174 and 45 m(3)/ton, respectively). The average annual consumption of blue water by major crops in the basin was 1.9 billion m(3), where 67% was used for sugarcane and maize, covering 48% of the cropland. The average annual consumption of green water was 1.0 billion m(3), where 68% was used for wheat and sugarcane, covering 67% of the cropland. The WFs of all crops exceeded the global average. The results showed that annually the basin is supplied with 30 billion m(3) of freshwater. Annually, 3 billion m(3) of freshwater leaves the basin unutilized. The average annual blue water consumption by major crops is 31% of the total available surface water (6 billion m(3)) in the basin. Tobacco and sugar beet had the highest blue and green EWP while wheat and maize had the lowest. The findings of this study can help the water management authorities in formulating a comprehensive policy for efficient utilization of available water resources in Peshawar Basin.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the water scarcity footprint of food crops by growing season available water remaining (AWARE) characterization factors in Thailand
    Kaewmai, Roihatai
    Grant, Timothy
    Mungkalasiri, Jitti
    Musikavong, Charongpun
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 763
  • [32] The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products
    Mekonnen, M. M.
    Hoekstra, A. Y.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (05) : 1577 - 1600
  • [33] The Water Footprint of European Agricultural Imports: Hotspots in the Context of Water Scarcity
    Dolganova, Iulia
    Mikosch, Natalia
    Berger, Markus
    Nunez, Montserrat
    Mueller-Frank, Andrea
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [34] Implications of Water Use and Water Scarcity Footprint for Sustainable Rice Cultivation
    Silalertruksa, Thapat
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    Mungkung, Rattanawan
    Nilsalab, Pariyapat
    Lecksiwilai, Naruetep
    Sawaengsak, Wanchat
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (12)
  • [35] Advancing water footprint assessments: Combining the impacts of water pollution and scarcity
    Pierrat, Eleonore
    Laurent, Alexis
    Dorber, Martin
    Rygaard, Martin
    Verones, Francesca
    Hauschild, Michael
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 870
  • [36] Water Resources Management Strategies for Irrigated Agriculture in the Indus Basin of Pakistan
    Muzammil, Muhammad
    Zahid, Azlan
    Breuer, Lutz
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [37] Comparing water footprint and water scarcity footprint of energy demand in China's six megacities
    Liao, Xiawei
    Zhao, Xu
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Li, Ruoshui
    Wang, Xiaoxi
    Wang, Wenpeng
    Tillotson, Martin R.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 269
  • [38] Water productivity in fruit trees orchards under water scarcity
    Ghrab, M.
    Masmoudi, M. M.
    Ben Mechlia, N.
    [J]. VIII INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, 2017, 1150 : 317 - 322
  • [39] Reducing water scarcity by improving water productivity in the United States
    Marston, Landon T.
    Lamsal, Gambhir
    Ancona, Zachary H.
    Caldwell, Peter
    Richter, Brian D.
    Ruddell, Benjamin L.
    Rushforth, Richard R.
    Davis, Kyle Frankel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [40] Increasing agricultural water productivity to manage water scarcity in China
    Li, YH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 54 : 32 - 32