Comment on 'Canonical magnetic insulators with isotropic magnetoelectric coupling' Reply
被引:0
|
作者:
Coh, Sinisa
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Div Mat Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USAUniv Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Coh, Sinisa
[1
,2
]
Vanderbilt, David
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Rutgers State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USAUniv Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
Vanderbilt, David
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Div Mat Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
We agree with the corrections that Perez-Mato et al. [Phys. Rev. B 90, 167101 (2014)] present in their Comment. However, we argue that the representation-theory approach, as used in our Rapid Communication, is more general than the magnetic-symmetry point of view adopted in the Comment.