Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions

被引:31
|
作者
Blumenfeld, Y. J. [1 ]
Caughey, A. B. [2 ]
El-Sayed, Y. Y. [1 ]
Daniels, K. [1 ]
Lyell, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Caesarean section; double layer; hysterotomy closure; single layer; suture technique; tissue adhesions; urinary bladder; UTERINE RUPTURE; MORBIDITY; INCISION; SURGERY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the association between single-layer (one running suture) and double-layer (second layer or imbricating suture) hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and subsequent adhesion formation. Design A secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Population One hundred and twenty-seven pregnant women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Methods Patient records were reviewed to identify whether primary caesarean hysterotomies were closed with a single or double layer. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression. Main outcome measure Prevalence rate of pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Results Of the 127 women, primary hysterotomy closure was single layer in 56 and double layer in 71. Single-layer hysterotomy closure was associated with bladder adhesions at the time of repeat caesarean (24% versus 7%, P = 0.01). Single-layer closure was associated in this study with a seven-fold increase in the odds of developing bladder adhesions (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-28.1), regardless of other surgical techniques, previous labour, infection and age over 35 years. There was no association between single-layer closure and other pelvic or abdominal adhesions. Conclusions Primary single-layer hysterotomy closure may be associated with more frequent bladder adhesions during repeat caesarean deliveries. The severity and clinical implications of these adhesions should be assessed in large prospective trials.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 694
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture
    Gyamfi, C
    Juhasz, G
    Gyamfi, P
    Rochon, M
    Blumenfeld, Y
    Stone, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S183 - S183
  • [22] Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Stegwee, S. I.
    Jordans, I. P. M.
    van der Voet, L. F.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    de Groot, C. J. M.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    de Leeuw, R. A.
    Hehenkamp, W. J. K.
    van de Ven, P. M.
    Bosmans, J. E.
    Pajkrt, E.
    Bakkum, E. A.
    Radder, C. M.
    Hemelaar, M.
    van Baal, W. M.
    Visser, H.
    van Laar, J. O. E. H.
    van Vliet, H. A. A. M.
    Rijnders, R. J. P.
    Sueters, M.
    Janssen, C. A. H.
    Hermes, W.
    Feitsma, A. H.
    Kapiteijn, K.
    Scheepers, H. C. J.
    Langenveld, J.
    de Boer, K.
    Coppus, S. F. P. J.
    Schippers, D. H.
    Oei, A. L. M.
    Kaplan, M.
    Papatsonis, D. N. M.
    de Vleeschouwer, L. H. M.
    van Beek, E.
    Bekker, M. N.
    Huisjes, A. J. M.
    Meijer, W. J.
    Deurloo, K. L.
    Boormans, E. M. A.
    van Eijndhoven, H. W. F.
    Huirne, J. A. F.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [23] Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development – the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    S. I. Stegwee
    I. P. M. Jordans
    L. F. van der Voet
    M. Y. Bongers
    C. J. M. de Groot
    C. B. Lambalk
    R. A. de Leeuw
    W. J. K. Hehenkamp
    P. M. van de Ven
    J. E. Bosmans
    E. Pajkrt
    E. A. Bakkum
    C. M. Radder
    M. Hemelaar
    W. M. van Baal
    H. Visser
    J. O. E. H. van Laar
    H. A. A. M. van Vliet
    R. J. P. Rijnders
    M. Sueters
    C. A. H. Janssen
    W. Hermes
    A. H. Feitsma
    K. Kapiteijn
    H. C. J. Scheepers
    J. Langenveld
    K. de Boer
    S. F. P. J. Coppus
    D. H. Schippers
    A. L. M. Oei
    M. Kaplan
    D. N. M. Papatsonis
    L. H. M. de Vleeschouwer
    E. van Beek
    M. N. Bekker
    A. J. M. Huisjes
    W. J. Meijer
    K. L. Deurloo
    E. M. A. Boormans
    H. W. F. van Eijndhoven
    J. A. F. Huirne
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [24] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure
    Huirne, J. A. F.
    Stegwee, S. I.
    van der Voet, L. F.
    de Groot, C. J. M.
    Hehenkamp, W. J. K.
    Brolmann, H. A. M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 664 - +
  • [25] Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study
    Glavind, J.
    Madsen, L. D.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    Dueholm, M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [26] Single-layer versus double-layer closure of facial lacerations: A randomized controlled trial
    Singer, AJ
    Gulla, J
    Hein, M
    Marchini, S
    Chale, S
    Arora, BP
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 116 (02) : 363 - 368
  • [27] The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study
    Hesselman, S.
    Hogberg, U.
    Ekholm-Selling, K.
    Rassjo, E-B
    Jonsson, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (11) : 1535 - 1541
  • [28] Formation of single- and double-layer silicon in slit pores
    Morishita, Tetsuya
    Nishio, Kengo
    Mikami, Masuhiro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2008, 77 (08)
  • [29] Single- vs double-layer and locking vs nonlocking closure of uterus: missing woods for the trees? REPLY
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Roberge, Stephanie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (06) : 829 - 830
  • [30] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure Reply
    Saccone, G.
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 666 - +