IaaS vs. Traditional Hosting for Web Applications - Cost Effectiveness Analysis for a Local Market

被引:0
|
作者
Lorenc, Pawel [1 ]
Woda, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Dept Comp Engn, Janiszewskiego 11-17, PL-50372 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
Cloud hosing; Traditional hosting; Web applications; Resources consumption; Cost effectiveness analysis;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-59415-6_23
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This work was carried out in order to examine the legitimacy of use and to compare ongoing cost of cloud based (IaaS) and classic hosting for three types of web applications. With a plethora of various cloud providers, increased reliability and plummeting down daily ongoing cost - Infrastructure as a Service seems to be a natural successor of traditional hosting for even fairly simple web applications. However, there was unclear until now, how IaaS compares to a traditional hosting in terms of cost-effectiveness. In that article three different types of sites were used to provide a clear answer which type of hosting to use to justify ongoing cost and the same time assure an optimal performance of a certain types of web applications.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 243
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Indoor Localization: A Cost-Effectiveness vs. Accuracy Study
    Mohebbi, Parisa
    Stroulia, Eleni
    Nikolaidis, Ioanis
    2017 IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CBMS), 2017, : 552 - 557
  • [32] Response to: Ranibizumab vs. pegaptanib: a cost-effectiveness study?
    Javier Hernandez-Pastor, Luis
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (11) : 1677 - 1677
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of Olanzapine vs. lithium in bipolar disorder
    Schaerer, LO
    Berns, S
    Born, C
    Brambilla, P
    Dobmeier, M
    Doppmann, T
    Graf, M
    Hartweg, V
    Hasmann, A
    Langosch, J
    Gerber, S
    Malliaris, Y
    Scott, HJ
    Seemüller, F
    Simhandl, C
    Torrent, C
    Trapp, W
    Wolf, J
    Grunze, H
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 110 : 35 - 35
  • [34] A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of radiosurgery vs. resection for single-brain metastases
    Mehta, M
    Noyes, W
    Craig, B
    Lamond, J
    Auchter, R
    French, M
    Johnson, M
    Levin, A
    Badie, B
    Robbins, I
    Kinsella, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 445 - 454
  • [35] Cost effectiveness of caspofungin vs. voriconazole for empiric therapy in Turkey
    Turner, S. J.
    Senol, E.
    Kara, A.
    Al-Badriyeh, D.
    Dinleyici, E. C.
    Kong, D. C. M.
    MYCOSES, 2014, 57 (08) : 489 - 496
  • [36] Response to: Ranibizumab vs. pegaptanib: a cost-effectiveness study?
    Luis Javier Hernández-Pastor
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2010, 248 : 1677 - 1677
  • [37] Measuring minimum variance hedging effectiveness: Traditional vs. sophisticated models
    Sharma, Udayan
    Karmakar, Madhusudan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 87
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of risedronate vs. Ibandronate: impact of persistence
    Grima, D.
    Pasquale, M.
    Lange, J.
    Thompson, M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 18 : S157 - S158
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness modeling of dental implant vs. bridge
    Bouchard, P.
    Renouard, F.
    Bourgeois, D.
    Fromentin, O.
    Jeanneret, M. H.
    Beresniak, A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (06) : 583 - 587
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness of risedronate vs. ibandronate: Impact of discounts
    Grima, D.
    Borisov, N. N.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 : S442 - S442