Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer

被引:60
|
作者
Ahn, Sang Hee [1 ]
Yeo, Adam Unjin [2 ]
Kim, Kwang Hyeon [1 ]
Kim, Chankyu [1 ]
Goh, Youngmoon [3 ]
Cho, Shinhaeng [4 ]
Lee, Se Byeong [1 ]
Lim, Young Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Haksoo [1 ]
Shin, Dongho [1 ]
Kim, Taeyoon [1 ]
Kim, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Youn, Sang Hee [1 ]
Oh, Eun Sang [1 ]
Jeong, Jong Hwi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 323 Ilsan Ro, Goyang Si 10408, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Sch, Gwangju, South Korea
关键词
Contouring; Atlas-based auto-segmentation; Deep-learning-based auto-segmentation; Deep convolution neural network (DCNN); CT IMAGES; REGISTRATION; HEAD;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-019-1392-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Accurate and standardized descriptions of organs at risk (OARs) are essential in radiation therapy for treatment planning and evaluation. Traditionally, physicians have contoured patient images manually, which, is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. This study aims to a) investigate whether customized, deep-learning-based auto-segmentation could overcome the limitations of manual contouring and b) compare its performance against a typical, atlas-based auto-segmentation method organ structures in liver cancer. Methods On-contrast computer tomography image sets of 70 liver cancer patients were used, and four OARs (heart, liver, kidney, and stomach) were manually delineated by three experienced physicians as reference structures. Atlas and deep learning auto-segmentations were respectively performed with MIM Maestro 6.5 (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH) and, with a deep convolution neural network (DCNN). The Hausdorff distance (HD) and, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume overlap error (VOE), and relative volume difference (RVD) were used to quantitatively evaluate the four different methods in the case of the reference set of the four OAR structures. Results The atlas-based method yielded the following average DSC and standard deviation values (SD) for the heart, liver, right kidney, left kidney, and stomach: 0.92 +/- 0.04 (DSC +/- SD), 0.93 +/- 0.02, 0.86 +/- 0.07, 0.85 +/- 0.11, and 0.60 +/- 0.13 respectively. The deep-learning-based method yielded corresponding values for the OARs of 0.94 +/- 0.01, 0.93 +/- 0.01, 0.88 +/- 0.03, 0.86 +/- 0.03, and 0.73 +/- 0.09. The segmentation results show that the deep learning framework is superior to the atlas-based framwork except in the case of the liver. Specifically, in the case of the stomach, the DSC, VOE, and RVD showed a maximum difference of 21.67, 25.11, 28.80% respectively. Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated that a deep learning framework could be used more effectively and efficiently compared to atlas-based auto-segmentation for most OARs in human liver cancer. Extended use of the deep-learning-based framework is anticipated for auto-segmentations of other body sites.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation of Organs-at-Risk for Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Byun, H. K.
    Chang, J. S.
    Choi, M. S.
    Chun, J.
    Jung, J.
    Jeong, C.
    Kim, J. S.
    Chang, Y.
    Lee, S.
    Kim, Y. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E108 - E108
  • [42] Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation of Target Volume and Normal Organs in Breast Cancer Patients
    Chung, S. Y.
    Chang, J. S.
    Chang, Y.
    Choi, B. S.
    Chun, J.
    Kim, J. S.
    Kim, Y. B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E613 - E614
  • [43] Grading evaluation study of atlas based auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax
    Ying, Y. C.
    Cheng, J. F.
    Wang, H.
    Gu, H. L.
    Chen, H.
    Shao, Y.
    Duan, Y. H.
    Feng, A. H.
    Fu, X. L.
    Quan, H.
    Xu, Z. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (04): : 647 - 656
  • [44] Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers
    Jordan Wong
    Vicky Huang
    Derek Wells
    Joshua Giambattista
    Jonathan Giambattista
    Carter Kolbeck
    Karl Otto
    Elantholi P. Saibishkumar
    Abraham Alexander
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [45] Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers
    Wong, Jordan
    Huang, Vicky
    Wells, Derek
    Giambattista, Joshua
    Giambattista, Jonathan
    Kolbeck, Carter
    Otto, Karl
    Saibishkumar, Elantholi P.
    Alexander, Abraham
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [46] A deep learning based auto-segmentation for GTVs on NPC MR images
    Xiangyu, E.
    Hongmei, Y.
    Weigang, H.
    Jiazhou, W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S553 - S554
  • [47] Developing Clinical Pipeline to Translate Deep Learning Based Auto-Segmentation Models for Radiotherapy Planning
    Lin, M.
    Bai, T.
    Wang, B.
    Nguyen, D.
    Gonzalez, Y.
    Wu, J.
    Yan, Y.
    Jia, X.
    Godley, A.
    Jiang, S.
    Lu, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E135 - E135
  • [48] An Optimized Training Module for Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation
    Amjad, A.
    Xhang, W.
    Chen, Z.
    Zhou, Q.
    Plautz, T.
    Buchanan, L.
    Li, X. A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E578 - E578
  • [49] Comparison of atlas-based auto-segmentation accuracy for radiotherapy in prostate cancer
    Aoyama, Takahiro
    Shimizu, Hidetoshi
    Kitagawa, Tomoki
    Yokoi, Kazushi
    Koide, Yutaro
    Tachibana, Hiroyuki
    Suzuki, Kojiro
    Kodaira, Takeshi
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 : 126 - 130
  • [50] Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
    Ma, Chen-ying
    Zhou, Ju-ying
    Xu, Xiao-ting
    Qin, Song-bing
    Han, Miao-fei
    Cao, Xiao-huan
    Gao, Yao-zong
    Xu, Lu
    Zhou, Jing-jie
    Zhang, Wei
    Jia, Le-cheng
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)