Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer

被引:60
|
作者
Ahn, Sang Hee [1 ]
Yeo, Adam Unjin [2 ]
Kim, Kwang Hyeon [1 ]
Kim, Chankyu [1 ]
Goh, Youngmoon [3 ]
Cho, Shinhaeng [4 ]
Lee, Se Byeong [1 ]
Lim, Young Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Haksoo [1 ]
Shin, Dongho [1 ]
Kim, Taeyoon [1 ]
Kim, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Youn, Sang Hee [1 ]
Oh, Eun Sang [1 ]
Jeong, Jong Hwi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 323 Ilsan Ro, Goyang Si 10408, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Sch, Gwangju, South Korea
关键词
Contouring; Atlas-based auto-segmentation; Deep-learning-based auto-segmentation; Deep convolution neural network (DCNN); CT IMAGES; REGISTRATION; HEAD;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-019-1392-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Accurate and standardized descriptions of organs at risk (OARs) are essential in radiation therapy for treatment planning and evaluation. Traditionally, physicians have contoured patient images manually, which, is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. This study aims to a) investigate whether customized, deep-learning-based auto-segmentation could overcome the limitations of manual contouring and b) compare its performance against a typical, atlas-based auto-segmentation method organ structures in liver cancer. Methods On-contrast computer tomography image sets of 70 liver cancer patients were used, and four OARs (heart, liver, kidney, and stomach) were manually delineated by three experienced physicians as reference structures. Atlas and deep learning auto-segmentations were respectively performed with MIM Maestro 6.5 (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH) and, with a deep convolution neural network (DCNN). The Hausdorff distance (HD) and, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume overlap error (VOE), and relative volume difference (RVD) were used to quantitatively evaluate the four different methods in the case of the reference set of the four OAR structures. Results The atlas-based method yielded the following average DSC and standard deviation values (SD) for the heart, liver, right kidney, left kidney, and stomach: 0.92 +/- 0.04 (DSC +/- SD), 0.93 +/- 0.02, 0.86 +/- 0.07, 0.85 +/- 0.11, and 0.60 +/- 0.13 respectively. The deep-learning-based method yielded corresponding values for the OARs of 0.94 +/- 0.01, 0.93 +/- 0.01, 0.88 +/- 0.03, 0.86 +/- 0.03, and 0.73 +/- 0.09. The segmentation results show that the deep learning framework is superior to the atlas-based framwork except in the case of the liver. Specifically, in the case of the stomach, the DSC, VOE, and RVD showed a maximum difference of 21.67, 25.11, 28.80% respectively. Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated that a deep learning framework could be used more effectively and efficiently compared to atlas-based auto-segmentation for most OARs in human liver cancer. Extended use of the deep-learning-based framework is anticipated for auto-segmentations of other body sites.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer
    Sang Hee Ahn
    Adam Unjin Yeo
    Kwang Hyeon Kim
    Chankyu Kim
    Youngmoon Goh
    Shinhaeng Cho
    Se Byeong Lee
    Young Kyung Lim
    Haksoo Kim
    Dongho Shin
    Taeyoon Kim
    Tae Hyun Kim
    Sang Hee Youn
    Eun Sang Oh
    Jong Hwi Jeong
    Radiation Oncology, 14
  • [2] Comparative Clinical Evaluation Of Deep-Learning-Based Algorithms In Auto-Segmentation Of Organs-At-Risk For Head And Neck Cancers
    Liu, A.
    Li, R.
    Han, C.
    Du, D.
    Sampath, S.
    Amini, A.
    Glaser, S. M.
    Wong, J. Y. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E817 - E817
  • [3] Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-segmentation for organs at risk delineation
    Yamauchi, Ryohei
    Itazawa, Tomoko
    Kobayashi, Takako
    Kashiyama, Shiho
    Akimoto, Hiroyoshi
    Mizuno, Norifumi
    Kawamori, Jiro
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (03) : 167 - 176
  • [4] Quantitative Comparisons of Deep-learning-based and Atlas-based Auto-segmentation of the Intermediate Risk Clinical Target Volume for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    He, Yisong
    Zhang, Shengyuan
    Luo, Yong
    Yu, Hang
    Fu, Yuchuan
    Wu, Zhangwen
    Jiang, Xiaoxuan
    Li, Ping
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (03) : 335 - 345
  • [5] Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-segmentation for critical organs at risk in radiation therapy
    Gibbons, Eddie
    Hoffmann, Matthew
    Westhuyzen, Justin
    Hodgson, Andrew
    Chick, Brendan
    Last, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2023, 70 : 15 - 25
  • [6] Clinical evaluation of deep learning for auto-segmentation of CT images in RT for lung cancer
    Johnston, N.
    De Rycke, J.
    Lievens, Y.
    Vanderstraeten, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1371 - S1372
  • [7] Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of deep learning based auto-segmentation for clinical target volume on breast cancer
    Zhong, Yang
    Guo, Ying
    Fang, Yingtao
    Wu, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Hu, Weigang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (07):
  • [8] EVALUATION OF ATLAS-BASED AUTO-SEGMENTATION FOR ART OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Stock, M.
    Simmat, I.
    Goldner, G.
    Georg, P.
    Birkfellner, W.
    Georg, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S189 - S190
  • [9] Comprehensive clinical evaluation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer
    Chung, Seung Yeun
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Kim, Yong Bae
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of atlas based auto-segmentation of cardiac structures in breast cancer patients
    Kaderka, Robert
    Gillespie, Erin F.
    Mundt, Robert C.
    Bryant, Alex K.
    Sanudo-Thomas, Camila B.
    Harrison, Anna L.
    Wouters, Emilie L.
    Moiseenko, Vitali
    Moore, Kevin L.
    Atwood, Todd F.
    Murphy, James D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 131 : 215 - 220