Stakeholder Attitudes on Carbon Capture and Storage - an international comparison

被引:9
|
作者
Johnsson, Filip [1 ]
Reiner, David [2 ]
Itaoka, Kenshi [3 ]
Herzog, Howard [4 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers, Environm & Energy Dept, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Cambridge CB2 1AG, England
[3] Mizuho Informat & Res Inst, Tokyo 1018443, Japan
[4] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
来源
关键词
Stakeholder perspectives; carbon dioxide and storage technologies;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.309
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper presents results from a survey on stakeholder attitudes towards Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). The survey is the first to make a global comparison across three major regions; USA, Japan, and Europe. The 30-question survey targeted individuals working at stakeholder organizations that seek to shape, and will need to respond to, policy on CCS, including electric utilities, oil & gas companies, CO2-intensive industries and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The results show generally small differences across the regions and between the different groups of stakeholders. All believed that the challenge of significant reductions in emissions using only current technologies was severe. There is a widespread belief both that renewable technologies such as solar power and CCS will achieve major market entry into the electricity sector within the next 10 to 20 years, whereas there is more skepticism about the role of hydrogen and especially nuclear fusion in the next 50 years. All groups were generally positive towards renewable energy. Yet, there were some notable areas of disagreement in the responses, for example, as expected, NGOs considered the threat of climate change to be more serious than the other groups. North Americans respondents were more likely to downplay the threat compared to those of the other regions. The Japanese were more concerned about the burden that would be placed on industry in the coming decade as a result of emissions constraints and NGOs were more likely to believe that the burden would be light or very light. NGOs believed CCS to be far more attractive than nuclear fusion power but much less than renewables. As expected, the risk for leakage from reservoirs was ranked number one of the risk options given. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:4819 / 4826
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Towards a Low-Carbon Society via Hydrogen and Carbon Capture and Storage: Social Acceptance from a Stakeholder Perspective
    Glanz, Sabrina
    Schoenauer, Anna-Lena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2021, 9 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [22] A stakeholder-centred narrative exploration on carbon capture, utilisation and storage: A systems thinking and participatory approach
    Mota-Nieto, Jazmin
    Garcia-Meneses, Paola Massyel
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2024, 113
  • [23] Stakeholder perceptions on carbon capture and storage technologies in Finland- economic, technological, political and societal uncertainties
    Kainiemi, Laura
    Toikka, Arho
    Jarvinen, Mika
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 7353 - 7360
  • [24] Predictors of attitudes toward carbon capture and storage using data on world views and CCS-specific attitudes
    Warren, David C.
    Carley, Sanya R.
    Krause, Rachel M.
    Rupp, John A.
    Graham, John D.
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 41 (06) : 821 - 834
  • [25] Comparing the explicit and implicit attitudes of energy stakeholders and the public towards carbon capture and storage
    Sun, Yan
    Li, Yang
    Cai, Bo-feng
    Li, Qi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 254
  • [26] Evolution of carbon capture and storage research: Trends of international collaborations and knowledge maps
    Karimi, Faezeh
    Khalilpour, Rajab
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 37 : 362 - 376
  • [27] Carbon dioxide capture and storage
    Benson, Sally M.
    Orr, Franklin M., Jr.
    [J]. MRS BULLETIN, 2008, 33 (04) : 303 - 305
  • [28] Is There a Future for Carbon Capture and Storage?
    Ekeland, Anders
    Kang, Rong
    Kovarnik, Jaroslav
    Hamplova, Eva
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 11(1), 2021, 11 : 168 - 175
  • [29] Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
    Yan, Jinyue
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 148 : A1 - A6
  • [30] Why carbon capture and storage?
    Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 1 (01): : 3 - 4