Does Deprescribing Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:26
|
作者
Pruskowski, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Springer, Sydney [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thorpe, Carolyn T. [2 ,4 ]
Klein-Fedyshin, Michele [5 ]
Handler, Steven M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, 3600 Forbes Ave & Meyran Ave,Suite 308-15, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ New England, Coll Pharm, Portland, ME USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh Hlth Sci, Lib Syst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SYMPTOM BURDEN; MEDICATION-USE; PEOPLE; POLYPHARMACY; PREVALENCE; INPATIENTS; HEALTH; FEASIBILITY; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-019-00717-1
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Deprescribing has been shown to reduce potentially inappropriate or unnecessary medications; however, whether these benefits translate into improved quality of life (QOL) is uncertain. Objective The objective of this study was to isolate the impact of deprescribing on patient or designated representative reported QOL; satisfaction with care (SWC) and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations were also investigated to further explore this question. Methods This systematic review searched the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), MEDLINE, and EMBASE from database inception until November 2017. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized prospective studies of older adults (> 65 years or older) and older persons with life-limiting conditions were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the search results and performed risk of bias assessments. Data on QOL, SWC, and ED visits and hospitalizations were extracted from all identified studies. Risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using measures recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results Screening of 6543 eligible records identified 12 studies within 13 articles. In ten studies investigating the reduction of at least one medication deprescribed, compared with usual care, all but two found no difference in QOL. To date there has only been one study examining the impact of deprescribing on SWC, which was found to be not statistically significant. Four studies exploring the impact of deprescribing on ED visits and hospitalizations also found no significant difference. However, many studies were found to have a higher performance, detection, or other bias. We found considerable heterogeneity in patient populations, targeted medications for deprescribing, and QOL measurements used in these studies. Conclusion Based on a limited number of studies with varying methodological rigor, deprescribing may not significantly improve QOL or SWC; however, it may not contribute to additional ED visits and hospitalizations. Future controlled studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1110
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How to improve the quality of life of elderly people with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review of support strategies
    Schepens, Hadewych R. M. M.
    Van Puyenbroeck, Joris
    Maes, Bea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 32 (03) : 483 - 521
  • [22] Complementary and alternative methods to improve quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic literature review
    Martinato, M.
    Comoretto, R. I.
    Zampieri, A.
    Monaco, E.
    Barberio, B.
    Azzolina, D.
    Savarino, E.
    Gregori, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2021, 15 : S613 - S614
  • [23] Interventions to improve symptoms and quality of life of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a systematic review of the literature
    Bajwah, Sabrina
    Ross, Joy R.
    Peacock, Janet L.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Wells, Athol U.
    Patel, Amit Suresh
    Koffman, Jonathan
    Riley, Julia
    [J]. THORAX, 2013, 68 (09) : 867 - 879
  • [24] QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH VENOUS THROMBOEMOBLISM: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Rao, N.
    Liu, X.
    Claflin, A. B.
    Phatak, H.
    Mitchell, S. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A533 - A533
  • [25] Impact of the Circular Economy on Quality of Life - A Systematic Literature Review
    Sekulic, Milena
    Stojanovic, Vladimir
    Pantelic, Milana
    Nad, Imre
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICA PANNONICA, 2022, 26 (01): : 78 - 91
  • [26] Quality of life in patients with Fabry disease: a systematic review of the literature
    Maarten Arends
    Carla E. M. Hollak
    Marieke Biegstraaten
    [J]. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 10
  • [27] QUALITY OF LIFE IN PAEDIATRIC MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Steeves, S.
    Beaver, S.
    Ashworth, L.
    Summers, J.
    Adlard, N. E.
    Kroes, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S350 - S350
  • [28] Quality of Life in Rare Genetic Conditions: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Cohen, Julie S.
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2010, 152A (05) : 1136 - 1156
  • [29] Quality of Life in Wilson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review
    Balijepalli, Chakrapani
    Yan, Kevin
    Gullapalli, Lakshmi
    Barakat, Stephane
    Chevrou-Severac, Helene
    Druyts, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 8 (02): : 105 - +
  • [30] Quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumours: A systematic literature review
    Watson, Catherine
    Tallentire, Craig William
    Ramage, John K.
    Srirajaskanthan, Rajaventhan
    Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R.
    Fountain, Donna
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (25) : 3686 - 3711