The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement

被引:30
|
作者
Kang, Kyung-Chung [1 ]
Lee, Chong-Suh [1 ]
Han, Jeong-Hoon [1 ]
Chung, Sung-Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Seoul 135710, South Korea
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2010年 / 10卷 / 08期
关键词
Cervical artificial disc replacement; Range of motion; Influencing factors; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LUMBAR SPINE; SPACE HEIGHT; FACET JOINT; FOLLOW-UP; FUSION; LEVEL; ADJACENT; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Advantages of cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) are to preserve segmental range of motion (ROM) and avoid adjacent segmental disease. To achieve successful outcome after cervical ADR, ROM maintenance is important, but few authors have investigated the factors that influence the postoperative segmental ROM. PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors that influence the postoperative segmental ROM after cervical ADR. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective clinical study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-one consecutive cervical ADR cases were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Disc height, segmental and overall ROM, and clinical parameters checked with Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) in neck and arm pain were assessed. METHODS: There were 21 men and 20 women with a mean age of 45 years (range, 27-61 years). All cases were followed up for more than 2 years (range, 24-54 months; average, 31 months). Angles of the inserted implant on the immediate postoperative lateral radiographs, segmental and overall ROM (full flexion angle-full extension angle), disc height increment (immediate postoperative disc height-preoperative disc height), and adjacent segment changes at cephalad and caudal disc space were measured. Correlations between the factors and segmental ROM at last follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean preoperative NDI was improved from 61.0 preoperatively to 11.5 at last follow-up, and mean VAS in the neck pain decreased from 56.8 preoperatively to 11.8 postoperatively and arm pain decreased from 68.1 to 18.0. The mean preoperative segmental ROM changed from 7.4 +/- 3.2 degrees preoperatively to 10.4 +/- 5.9 degrees at last follow-up, and mean preoperative disc height increased from 6.4 +/- 1.0 (4.1-8.4) mm preoperatively to 7.9 +/- 1.0 (6.3-9.9) mm postoperatively. The segmental ROM at last follow-up was not significantly correlated with preoperative segmental and overall ROM, angle of inserted implant, VAS, or age (p>.05). However, the segmental ROM at last follow-up was significantly correlated with the disc height increment (p=.046, r=0.374) and preoperative NDI (p=.026, r=0.412). The patient group with the postoperative segmental ROM greater than 10 degrees had a significantly lower mean preoperative disc height than the group with the segmental ROM less than 10 degrees (p=.050). CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum of 2 years after cervical ADR, clinical outcomes were satisfactory in terms of function and pain scores. Within our results, the segmental ROM was not affected by preoperative ROM but postoperative disc height increment positively and preoperative disc height negatively. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 696
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Postoperative Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement Is Likely a Reflection of the Degeneration Process
    Li, Guangzhou
    Wang, Qing
    Liu, Hao
    Yang, Yi
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : E1063 - E1068
  • [42] Artificial cervical disc replacement: Principles, types and techniques
    Sekhon, LHS
    Ball, JR
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2005, 53 (04) : 445 - 450
  • [43] Porous Coated Motion Cervical Disc Replacement System
    Sinkov, Vladimir
    McAfee, Paul C.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 25 (02) : 127 - 132
  • [44] Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement
    Mehren, Christoph
    Suchomel, Petr
    Grochulla, Frank
    Barsa, Pavel
    Sourkova, Petra
    Hradil, Jan
    Korge, Andreas
    Mayer, H. Michael
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (24) : 2802 - 2806
  • [45] Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Radiculopathy After Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Technique Description and Case Report
    Sarmiento, J. Manuel
    Hanna, George
    Baron, Eli M.
    Lanman, Todd H.
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Cuellar, Jason M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02): : 384 - 392
  • [46] Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion
    Hou, Yang
    Liu, Yang
    Yuan, Wen
    Wang, Xinwei
    Chen, Huajiang
    Yang, Lili
    Zhang, Ying
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (06): : 867 - 877
  • [47] Motion preservation after cervical total disc replacement surgery-fact or fiction?
    Younus, Aftab
    Kelly, Adrian
    van der Meulen, Weibo
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 23
  • [48] Segmental Motion of the Cervical Spine After Total Disc Replacement Using ActivC Versus Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-alone Cage
    Kim, Bum-Joon
    Kim, Se-Hoon
    Lee, Seung-Hwan
    Ha, Sung-Kon
    Kim, Sang-Dae
    Lim, Dong-Jun
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E1228 - E1234
  • [49] Segmental Contribution Toward Total Lumbar Range of Motion in Disc Replacement and Fusions A Comparison of Operative and Adjacent Levels
    Auerbach, Joshua D.
    Jones, Kristofer J.
    Milby, Andrew H.
    Anakwenze, Okechukwu A.
    Balderston, Richard A.
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (23) : 2510 - 2517
  • [50] Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement
    Yaszay, Burt
    Bendo, John A.
    Goldstein, Jeffrey A.
    Quirno, Martin
    Spivak, Jeffrey M.
    Errico, Thomas J.
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (05) : 508 - 512