Classification of CO2 Geologic Storage: Resource and Capacity

被引:14
|
作者
Frailey, Scott M. [1 ]
Finley, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Geol Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
来源
关键词
Type your keywords here; separated by semicolons;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.029
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The use of the term capacity to describe possible geologic storage implies a realistic or likely volume of CO(2) to be sequestered. Poor data quantity and quality may lead to very high uncertainty in the storage estimate. Use of the term "storage resource" alleviates the implied certainty of the term "storage capacity". This is especially important to non-scientists (e. g. policy makers) because "capacity" is commonly used to describe the very specific and more certain quantities such as volume of a gas tank or a hotel's overnight guest limit. Resource is a term used in the classification of oil and gas accumulations to infer lesser certainty in the commercial production of oil and gas. Likewise for CO(2) sequestration, a suspected porous and permeable zone can be classified as a resource, but capacity can only be estimated after a well is drilled into the formation and a relatively higher degree of economic and regulatory certainty is established. Storage capacity estimates are lower risk or higher certainty compared to storage resource estimates. In the oil and gas industry, prospective resource and contingent resource are used for estimates with less data and certainty. Oil and gas reserves are classified as Proved and Unproved, and by analogy, capacity can be classified similarly. The highest degree of certainty for an oil or gas accumulation is Proved, Developed Producing (PDP) Reserves. For CO(2) sequestration this could be Proved Developed Injecting (PDI) Capacity. A geologic sequestration storage classification system is developed by analogy to that used by the oil and gas industry. When a CO(2) sequestration industry emerges, storage resource and capacity estimates will be considered a company asset and consequently regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, storage accounting and auditing protocols will be required to confirm projected storage estimates and assignment of credits from actual injection. An example illustrates the use of these terms and how storage classification changes as new data become available. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2623 / 2630
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of geologic reservoir uncertainty on CO2 transport and storage infrastructure
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Keating, Gordon N.
    Viswanathan, Hari S.
    Stauffer, Philip H.
    Pawar, Rajesh J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 8 : 132 - 142
  • [42] Progress in monitoring strategies for risk reduction in geologic CO2 storage
    Harbert, William
    Daley, Thomas M.
    Bromhal, Grant
    Sullivan, Charlotte
    Huang, Lianjie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 51 : 260 - 275
  • [43] Regulating the ultimate sink:: Managing the risks of geologic CO2 storage
    Wilson, EJ
    Johnson, TL
    Keith, DW
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (16) : 3476 - 3483
  • [44] A Threshold Line for Safe Geologic CO2 Storage Based on Field Measurement of Soil CO2 Flux
    Kuriyama, Takashi
    Quoc Huy, Phung
    Salmawati, Salmawati
    Sasaki, Kyuro
    [J]. C-JOURNAL OF CARBON RESEARCH, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [45] Training carbon management engineers: why new educational capacity is the single biggest hurdle for geologic CO2 storage
    Bryant, Steven
    Olson, Jon
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 4741 - 4748
  • [46] CO2 sequestration:: Storage capacity guideline needed
    Frailey, Scott M.
    Finley, Robert J.
    Hickman, T. Scott
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2006, 104 (30) : 44 - +
  • [47] IMMEDIATE CO2 STORAGE CAPACITY AT THE ONSET OF EXERCISE
    YANO, T
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 36 (06): : 1241 - 1252
  • [48] CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Methodology and gaps
    Bachu, Stefan
    Bonijoly, Didier
    Bradshaw, John
    Burruss, Robert
    Holloway, Sam
    Christensen, Niels Peter
    Mathiassen, Odd Magne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (04) : 430 - 443
  • [49] Effect of storage capacity on CO2 pipeline optimisation
    Wang, Z.
    Weihs, G. A. Fimbres
    Neal, P. R.
    Wiley, D. E.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 2757 - 2763
  • [50] Capacity investigation of brine-bearing sands for geologic sequestration of CO2
    Doughty, C
    Benson, SM
    Pruess, K
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1645 - 1648