共 50 条
Brief Physician Advice for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial in College Health Clinics
被引:62
|作者:
Fleming, Michael F.
[1
]
Balousek, Stacey L.
[1
]
Grossberg, Paul M.
[1
]
Mundt, Marlon P.
[1
]
Brown, David
[1
]
Wiegel, Jennifer R.
[1
]
Zakletskaia, Larissa I.
[1
]
Saewyc, Elizabeth M.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Family Med, Madison, WI 53715 USA
关键词:
ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS;
PRIMARY-CARE;
BRIEF INTERVENTION;
HARM REDUCTION;
DRINKERS;
ADULTS;
RISK;
IDENTIFICATION;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
METAANALYSIS;
D O I:
10.15288/jsad.2010.71.23
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of brief physician advice in reducing alcohol use and related harm in college students. Method: The College Health Intervention Projects (CHIPs) is a randomized, controlled clinical trial with 12-month follow-up conducted in five college health clinics in Wisconsin; Washington state; and Vancouver, Canada. Of the 12,900 students screened for high-risk drinking, 484 men and 502 women met inclusion criteria and were randomized into a control (n = 493) or intervention (n = 493) group. Ninety-six percent of students participated in the follow-up procedures. The intervention consisted of two 15-minute counseling visits and two follow-up phone calls, and used motivational interviewing, contracting, diary cards, and take-home exercises. Results: No significant differences were found between groups at baseline on alcohol use, age, socioeconomic or smoking status, rates of depression, or measures of alcohol-related harm. At 12 months, the experimental subjects reduced their 28-day drinking totals by 27.2%, and the control group reduced their totals by 21%. A mixed effects repeated measures model found a statistical difference in favor of the brief-intervention group (beta = 4.7, SE = 2.0, p = .018) in 28-day drinking totals. The total Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index score was also significantly different during the 12-month follow-up period (beta = 0.8, SE = 0.4, p = .033). There was no difference on the other outcome measures of interest, such as frequency of excessive heavy drinking, health care utilization, injuries, drunk driving, depression, or tobacco use. Conclusions: The study supports resource allocation and implementation of alcohol screening and brief physician advice in primary care-based college health clinics. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 71. 23-31, 2010)
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文