Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping

被引：29
|
作者：
Montironi, Rodolfo [1 ]
Santoni, Matteo [2 ]
Mazzucchelli, Roberta [1 ]
Burattini, Luciano [2 ]
Berardi, Rossana [2 ]
Galosi, Andrea B. [3 ]
Cheng, Liang [4 ]
Lopez-Beltran, Antonio [5 ]
Briganti, Alberto [6 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [6 ]
Scarpelli, Marina [1 ]
机构：
[1] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, United Hosp, Sch Med, Sect Pathol Anat, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, AOU Osped Riuniti, Clin Oncol Med, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[3] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, Sch Med, Urol Clin, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[4] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[5] Champalimaud Clin Ctr, Pathol Serv, Lisbon, Portugal
[6] IRCCS, Osped San Raffaele, URI, Unit Urol,Div Oncol, Milan, Italy
来源：
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY | 2016年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词：
prognostic grade grouping; 2014 ISUP Gleason modified system; International society of urological pathology; Prostate cancer; Gleason grading; 2005 ISUP Gleason modified system; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; MEN; METASTASIS; SYSTEM;
D O I：
10.1586/14737140.2016.1160780
中图分类号：
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号：
100214 ;
摘要：
The Gleason grading system was developed in the late 1960s by Dr. Donald F. Gleason. Due to changes in prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) detection and treatment, newer technologies to better characterize prostatic pathology, subsequently described variants of PAC and further data relating various morphologic patterns to prognosis, the application of the Gleason grading system changed substantially in surgical pathology. First in 2005 and more recently in 2014, consensus conferences were held to update PAC grading. Here, we review of the successive changes in the grading of PAC from the original system, with emphasis on the newest prognostic grade grouping.
引用
收藏
页码：433 / 440
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gleason scoring ethnicity: its prognostic significance in prostate cancer patients of multi-ethnic origins
    Thwaini, A.
    Naase, M.
    Ghali, L.
    Baithun, S.
    Chinegwundoh, F.
    Ahmed, R.
    Elterifi, I.
    Morgan, D.
    Richard, L.
    Iles, R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 : 9 - 9
  • [22] GROUPING GLEASON SCORE 8 AND GLEASON SCORE 9-10 PROSTATE CANCER AS A SINGLE ENTITY RISKS LOSING PROGNOSTIC INFORMATION FOR MORTALITY
    Ham, Won Sik
    Chalfin, Heather J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Partin, Alan W.
    Han, Misop
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E988 - E989
  • [23] Saturation biopsy improves preoperative Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
    Kahl, Philip
    Wolf, Susanne
    Adam, Alexander
    Heukamp, Lukas Carl
    Ellinger, Joerg
    Vorreuther, Roland
    Solleder, Gerold
    Buettner, Reinhard
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2009, 205 (04) : 259 - 264
  • [24] Consensus guidelines for reporting prostate cancer Gleason Grade
    Zietman, Anthony
    Smith, Joseph
    Klein, Eric
    Droller, Michael
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Catto, James
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (06) : 849 - 849
  • [25] Consensus guidelines for reporting prostate cancer Gleason Grade
    Egevad, Lars
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Srigley, John R.
    Delahunt, Brett
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (03) : E1 - E2
  • [26] Consensus Guidelines for Reporting Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade
    Klein, Eric
    Zietman, Anthony
    Smith, Joseph
    Droller, Michael
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Catto, James
    UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 1 - 1
  • [27] CONSENSUS GUIDELINES FOR REPORTING PROSTATE CANCER GLEASON GRADE
    Zietman, Anthony
    Klein, Eric
    Droller, Michael J.
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Catto, James
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (06): : 1723 - 1723
  • [28] The prognostic significance of Gleason Grade in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Potters, L
    Purrazzella, R
    Brustein, S
    Fearn, P
    Huang, D
    Leibel, SA
    Kattan, MW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (03): : 749 - 754
  • [29] Prostate adenocarcinoma Gleason grade five morphological patterns' prognostic significance
    Franklin, Anthony
    Yaxley, John
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 : 129 - 130
  • [30] The prognostic significance of Gleason scores in metastatic prostate cancer
    Rusthoven, Chad G.
    Carlson, Julie A.
    Waxweiler, Timothy V.
    Yeh, Norman
    Raben, David
    Flaig, Thomas W.
    Kavanagh, Brian D.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (05) : 707 - 713
12345