Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping

被引：29
|
作者：
Montironi, Rodolfo [1 ]
Santoni, Matteo [2 ]
Mazzucchelli, Roberta [1 ]
Burattini, Luciano [2 ]
Berardi, Rossana [2 ]
Galosi, Andrea B. [3 ]
Cheng, Liang [4 ]
Lopez-Beltran, Antonio [5 ]
Briganti, Alberto [6 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [6 ]
Scarpelli, Marina [1 ]
机构：
[1] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, United Hosp, Sch Med, Sect Pathol Anat, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, AOU Osped Riuniti, Clin Oncol Med, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[3] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, Sch Med, Urol Clin, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[4] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[5] Champalimaud Clin Ctr, Pathol Serv, Lisbon, Portugal
[6] IRCCS, Osped San Raffaele, URI, Unit Urol,Div Oncol, Milan, Italy
来源：
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY | 2016年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词：
prognostic grade grouping; 2014 ISUP Gleason modified system; International society of urological pathology; Prostate cancer; Gleason grading; 2005 ISUP Gleason modified system; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; MEN; METASTASIS; SYSTEM;
D O I：
10.1586/14737140.2016.1160780
中图分类号：
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号：
100214 ;
摘要：
The Gleason grading system was developed in the late 1960s by Dr. Donald F. Gleason. Due to changes in prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) detection and treatment, newer technologies to better characterize prostatic pathology, subsequently described variants of PAC and further data relating various morphologic patterns to prognosis, the application of the Gleason grading system changed substantially in surgical pathology. First in 2005 and more recently in 2014, consensus conferences were held to update PAC grading. Here, we review of the successive changes in the grading of PAC from the original system, with emphasis on the newest prognostic grade grouping.
引用
收藏
页码：433 / 440
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gleason grade grouping of prostate cancer is of prognostic value in Asian men
    Yeong, Joe
    Sultana, Rehena
    Teo, Jonathan
    Huang, Hong Hong
    Yuen, John
    Tan, Puay Hoon
    Khor, Li Yan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (09) : 745 - 753
  • [2] Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping: Data Based on the Modifed Gleason Scoring System
    Epstein, J. I.
    Walsh, P. C.
    Partin, A. W.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 202A - 202A
  • [3] Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping: Data Based on the Modifed Gleason Scoring System
    Epstein, J. I.
    Walsh, P. C.
    Partin, A. W.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 202A - 202A
  • [4] Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (05) : 753 - 760
  • [5] Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Simko, Jeffry
    Roberge, Gray
    Stohr, Bradley A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (05) : 750 - 759
  • [6] Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer
    Wissing, Michel
    Brimo, Fadi
    Chevalier, Simone
    Scarlata, Eleonora
    McKercher, Ginette
    O'Flaherty, Ana
    Aprikian, Saro
    Thibodeau, Valerie
    Saad, Fred
    Carmel, Michel
    Lacombe, Louis
    Tetu, Bernard
    Ekindi-Ndongo, Nadia
    Latour, Mathieu
    Trudel, Dominique
    Aprikian, Armen
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 (04) : 624 - 631
  • [7] Validation of the prognostic Gleason grade grouping in a large cohort of Asian men with organconfined prostate cancer using a prospectively maintained database
    Teo, J. S. M.
    Khor, L. Y.
    Rehena, G.
    Huang, H. H.
    Yeong, J. P. S.
    Lau, W. K. O.
    Tan, P. H.
    Yuen, J. S. P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 : 6 - 6
  • [8] Editorial Statement on Gleason Scoring for Prostate Cancer
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Smith, Joseph
    Klein, Eric
    Droller, Michael
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Catto, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (04): : 1092 - 1092
  • [9] Editorial Statement on Gleason Scoring for Prostate Cancer
    Egevad, Lars
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Srigley, John R.
    Delahunt, Brett
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (05): : 1126 - +
  • [10] Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Morikawa, Teppei
    Shibahara, Junji
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 614 - 621
12345