Comparing and visualizing titanium implant integration in rat bone using 2D and 3D techniques

被引:7
|
作者
Arvidsson, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Sarve, Hamid [2 ,3 ]
Johansson, Carina B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dentsply IH AB, SE-43121 Molndal, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Prosthodont Dent Mat Sci, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Image Anal, SE-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
osseointegration; SR mu CT; rat model; histomorphometry; titanium; REMOVAL TORQUE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE; FIXATION; CONTACT; CALLUS; ACID; PTH; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.33168
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim was to compare the osseointegration of grit-blasted implants with and without a hydrogen fluoride treatment in rat tibia and femur, and to visualize bone formation using state-of-the-art 3D visualization techniques. Grit-blasted implants were inserted in femur and tibia of 10 Sprague-Dawley rats (4 implants/rat). Four weeks after insertion, bone implant samples were retrieved. Selected samples were imaged in 3D using Synchrotron Radiation-based CT (SRCT). The 3D data was quantified and visualized using two novel visualization techniques, thread fly-through and 2D unfolding. All samples were processed to cut and ground sections and 2D histomorphometrical comparisons of bone implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), and mirror image area (MI) were performed. BA values were statistically significantly higher for test implants than controls (p<0.05), but BIC and MI data did not differ significantly. Thus, the results partly indicate improved bone formation at blasted and hydrogen fluoride treated implants, compared to blasted implants. The 3D analysis was a valuable complement to 2D analysis, facilitating improved visualization. However, further studies are required to evaluate aspects of 3D quantitative techniques, with relation to light microscopy that traditionally is used for osseointegration studies. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 103B: 12-20, 2015.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MLPG refinement techniques for 2D and 3D diffusion problems
    Mazzia, Annamaria
    Pini, Giorgio
    Sartoretto, Flavio
    CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 2014, 102 (06): : 475 - 497
  • [32] Review on 2D and 3D MRI Image Segmentation Techniques
    Shirly, S.
    Ramesh, K.
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (02) : 150 - 160
  • [33] A Unified 3D Mapping Framework Using a 3D or 2D LiDAR
    Zhen, Weikun
    Scherer, Sebastian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EXPERIMENTAL ROBOTICS, 2020, 11 : 702 - 711
  • [34] MLPG Refinement Techniques for 2D and 3D Diffusion Problems
    Mazzia, Annamaria
    Pini, Giorgio
    Sartoretto, Flavio
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2014, 102 (06): : 475 - 497
  • [35] Groundbreaking 2D and 3D Dosimetry Techniques Using Scintillating Fibers and Tomographic Reconstruction
    Goulet, M.
    Archambault, L.
    Beaulieu, L.
    Gingras, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3885 - 3885
  • [36] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [37] Comparing 2D and 3D Solar Radiation Modeling in Urban Areas
    Kolecansky, Stefan
    Hofierka, Jaroslav
    Boglarsky, Jozef
    Supinsky, Jozef
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [38] Scenes in the Human Brain: Comparing 2D versus 3D Representations
    Groen, Iris I. A.
    Baker, Chris I.
    NEURON, 2019, 101 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [39] Comparing 2D and 3D Digital Image Correlation for an Inflation Test
    Murienne, Barbara J.
    Nguyen, Thao D.
    MECHANICS OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS AND MATER IALS, VOL 6, 2016, : 61 - 67
  • [40] 2D and 3D Titanium Phosphate Materials: Crystal Structure and Properties
    Garcia-Granda, Santiago
    Garcia-Glez, Jorge
    Trobajo, Camino
    Amghouz, Zakariae
    Khainakov, Sergei A.
    Ania, Conchi O.
    Parra, Jose B.
    Babaryk, Artem A.
    da Silva, Ivan
    Castro, German R.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2016, 72 : S277 - S278