Comparing and visualizing titanium implant integration in rat bone using 2D and 3D techniques

被引:7
|
作者
Arvidsson, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Sarve, Hamid [2 ,3 ]
Johansson, Carina B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dentsply IH AB, SE-43121 Molndal, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Prosthodont Dent Mat Sci, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Image Anal, SE-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
osseointegration; SR mu CT; rat model; histomorphometry; titanium; REMOVAL TORQUE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE; FIXATION; CONTACT; CALLUS; ACID; PTH; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.33168
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim was to compare the osseointegration of grit-blasted implants with and without a hydrogen fluoride treatment in rat tibia and femur, and to visualize bone formation using state-of-the-art 3D visualization techniques. Grit-blasted implants were inserted in femur and tibia of 10 Sprague-Dawley rats (4 implants/rat). Four weeks after insertion, bone implant samples were retrieved. Selected samples were imaged in 3D using Synchrotron Radiation-based CT (SRCT). The 3D data was quantified and visualized using two novel visualization techniques, thread fly-through and 2D unfolding. All samples were processed to cut and ground sections and 2D histomorphometrical comparisons of bone implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), and mirror image area (MI) were performed. BA values were statistically significantly higher for test implants than controls (p<0.05), but BIC and MI data did not differ significantly. Thus, the results partly indicate improved bone formation at blasted and hydrogen fluoride treated implants, compared to blasted implants. The 3D analysis was a valuable complement to 2D analysis, facilitating improved visualization. However, further studies are required to evaluate aspects of 3D quantitative techniques, with relation to light microscopy that traditionally is used for osseointegration studies. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 103B: 12-20, 2015.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing 2D and 3D Imaging
    Ballantyne, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION IN MEDICINE, 2011, 34 (03) : 138 - 141
  • [2] Characterization of controlled bone defects using 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging techniques
    Parmar, Biren J.
    Longsine, Whitney
    Sabonghy, Eric P.
    Han, Arum
    Tasciotti, Ennio
    Weiner, Bradley K.
    Ferrari, Mauro
    Righetti, Raffaella
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (16): : 4839 - 4859
  • [3] Using specularities in comparing 3D models and 2D images
    Osadchy, Margarita
    Jacobs, David
    Ramamoorthi, Ravi
    Tucker, David
    COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2008, 111 (03) : 275 - 294
  • [4] 2D and 3D Nanopatterning of Titanium for Enhancing Osteoinduction of Stem Cells at Implant Surfaces
    Sjoestroem, Terje
    McNamara, Laura E.
    Meek, R. M. Dominic
    Dalby, Matthew J.
    Su, Bo
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2013, 2 (09) : 1285 - 1293
  • [5] Comparing of 2D and 3D modeling of MSM
    Bulva, J
    Szendiuch, I
    2005 Spanish Conference on Electron Devices, Proceedings, 2005, : 473 - 475
  • [6] 3D Heterogeneous Integration with 2D Materials
    McClellan, Connor
    Bailey, Connor
    Datye, Isha
    Gabourie, Alexander
    Grady, Ryan
    Schauble, Kirstin
    Vaziri, Sam
    Pop, Eric
    2019 SILICON NANOELECTRONICS WORKSHOP (SNW), 2019, : 89 - 90
  • [7] Monolithic 3D integration with 2D materials
    Han, Sangmoon
    Moon, Ji-Yun
    Bae, Sang-Hoon
    NATURE ELECTRONICS, 2024, : 854 - 855
  • [8] Comparing User Experiences in 2D and 3D Videoconferencing
    Hemami, Sheila S.
    Ciaramello, Francis M.
    Chen, Sean S.
    Drenkow, Nathan G.
    Lee, Dae Yeol
    Lee, Seonwoo
    Levine, Evan G.
    McCann, Adam J.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP 2012), 2012, : 1969 - 1972
  • [9] Fetal dacryocystocele: comparing 2D and 3D imaging
    Petrikovsky, BM
    Kaplan, GP
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 33 (08) : 582 - 583
  • [10] Fetal dacryocystocele: comparing 2D and 3D imaging
    Boris M. Petrikovsky
    Gary P. Kaplan
    Pediatric Radiology, 2003, 33 : 582 - 583