Coupling SNOWPACK-modeled grain size parameters with the HUT snow emission model

被引:19
|
作者
Kontu, Anna [1 ]
Lemmetyinen, Juha [1 ]
Vehvilainen, Juho [1 ]
Leppanen, Leena [1 ]
Pulliainen, Jouni [1 ]
机构
[1] Arctic Res, Finnish Meteorol Inst, Tahtelantie 62, Sodankyla 99600, Finland
关键词
Snow grain size; Microwave radiometry; SNOWPACK; HUT snow emission model; WATER EQUIVALENT; MICROWAVE EMISSION; BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE; FIELD-MEASUREMENTS; CORRELATION LENGTH; RADIOMETER DATA; SURFACE-AREA; DENSE MEDIA; STRATIGRAPHY; SCATTERING;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We studied whether the physical snow evolution model SNOWPACK could be used together with the HUT snow emission model to simulate microwave brightness temperatures (TB) of snow cover and to parameterize key a priori variables in the retrieval of snow water equivalent (SWE). We used the extensive in situ measurement data set collected in Sodankyla, Finland, during the Nordic Snow Radar Experiment (NoSREx) campaign in 2009-2013 to model the evolution of snow with SNOWPACK. Resulting snow profiles were validated with manual in situ measurements. Mean agreement scores (for a winter) were 0.85-0.91 for traditional grain size, 0.74-0.75 for optical grain size, 0.65-0.80 for density, and 0.71-0.83 for temperature. Grain sizes modeled with SNOW-PACK were compared to effective grain size retrieved from tower-based microwave radiometer measurements. The bias and RMS error of SNOWPACK optical grain size were -0.03 mm and 0.20 mm, respectively, and those of SNOWPACK traditional grain size were 0.30 mm and 0.33 mm, respectively. SNOWPACK snow profiles were used as input to the HUT snow emission model for calculation of TB, which was compared to microwave radiometer measurements. TB calculated with SNOWPACK optical grain size exhibited lower biases (from -12.5 k to 16.2 K, depending on year and frequency) and RMS errors (from 33 K to 18.5 K) than TB calculated with SNOW-PACK traditional grain size (bias from -42.2 K to -9.9 K, RMS error from 12.0 K to 44.7 K). Grain sizes, temperature, and density modeled with SNOWPACK were used as a priori snow data in the retrieval of SWE from tower based microwave radiometer observations. The lowest overall bias and RMS error were reached when traditional grain size from SNOW-PACK was used, either directly with modelled snow density and temperature ( 33 mm and 58 mm, respectively) or with an effective grain size correction and static snow density and temperature applied (22 mm and 59 mm, respectively). (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the Effective Microstructure Parameter of the Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpack for Multiple-Layer Snow
    Yu, Yue
    Pan, Jinmei
    Shi, Jiancheng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [22] Retrieval of snow water equivalent over boreal forest in Canada from passive microwave measurements using the HUT snow emission model
    Roy, V
    Goïta, K
    Royer, A
    Walker, AE
    Goodison, BE
    IGARSS 2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM AND 24TH CANADIAN SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING, VOLS I-VI, PROCEEDINGS: REMOTE SENSING: INTEGRATING OUR VIEW OF THE PLANET, 2002, : 220 - 222
  • [23] Evaluation of the HUT modified snow emission model over lake ice using airborne passive microwave measurements
    Gunn, Grant E.
    Duguay, Claude R.
    Derksen, Chris
    Lemmetyinen, Juha
    Toose, Peter
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (01) : 233 - 244
  • [24] On the Relationship Between Stickiness in DMRT Theory and Physical Parameters of Snowpack: Theoretical Formulation and Experimental Validation With SNOWPACK Snow Model and X-Band SAR Data
    Pilia, Simone
    Baroni, Fabrizio
    Lapini, Alessandro
    Paloscia, Simonetta
    Pettinato, Simone
    Santi, Emanuele
    Pampaloni, Paolo
    Valt, Mauro
    Monti, Fabiano
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [25] Assessment of Snow Grain-Size Model and Stratigraphy Representation Impacts on Snow Radiance Assimilation: Forward Modeling Evaluation
    Huang, Chunlin
    Margulis, Steven A.
    Durand, Michael T.
    Musselman, Keith N.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 50 (11): : 4551 - 4564
  • [26] Assessment of grain size and lattice parameters of titanium alloy through electromagnetic emission technique
    Chauhan V.S.
    Misra A.
    International Journal of Microstructure and Materials Properties, 2011, 6 (06) : 486 - 506
  • [27] Case study of spatial and temporal variability of snow cover, grain size, albedo and radiative forcing in the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountain snowpack derived from imaging spectroscopy
    Seidel, Felix C.
    Rittger, Karl
    Skiles, S. McKenzie
    Molotch, Noah P.
    Painter, Thomas H.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2016, 10 (03): : 1229 - 1244
  • [28] Validation of the SNTHERM Model Applied for Snow Depth, Grain Size, and Brightness Temperature Simulation at Meteorological Stations in China
    Chen, Tao
    Pan, Jinmei
    Chang, Shunli
    Xiong, Chuan
    Shi, Jiancheng
    Liu, Mingyu
    Che, Tao
    Wang, Lifu
    Liu, Hongrui
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [29] Remote sensing of snow grain-size and impurities from Airborne Multispectral Scanner data using a snow bidirectional reflectance distribution function model
    Tanikawa, T
    Aoki, T
    Nishio, F
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 34, 2002, 2002, 34 : 74 - 80
  • [30] Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity based on grain size distribution parameters using power function model
    Kango, Rajat
    Shankar, Vijay
    Alam, M. A.
    WATER SUPPLY, 2019, 19 (02) : 596 - 602