Coupling SNOWPACK-modeled grain size parameters with the HUT snow emission model

被引:19
|
作者
Kontu, Anna [1 ]
Lemmetyinen, Juha [1 ]
Vehvilainen, Juho [1 ]
Leppanen, Leena [1 ]
Pulliainen, Jouni [1 ]
机构
[1] Arctic Res, Finnish Meteorol Inst, Tahtelantie 62, Sodankyla 99600, Finland
关键词
Snow grain size; Microwave radiometry; SNOWPACK; HUT snow emission model; WATER EQUIVALENT; MICROWAVE EMISSION; BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE; FIELD-MEASUREMENTS; CORRELATION LENGTH; RADIOMETER DATA; SURFACE-AREA; DENSE MEDIA; STRATIGRAPHY; SCATTERING;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We studied whether the physical snow evolution model SNOWPACK could be used together with the HUT snow emission model to simulate microwave brightness temperatures (TB) of snow cover and to parameterize key a priori variables in the retrieval of snow water equivalent (SWE). We used the extensive in situ measurement data set collected in Sodankyla, Finland, during the Nordic Snow Radar Experiment (NoSREx) campaign in 2009-2013 to model the evolution of snow with SNOWPACK. Resulting snow profiles were validated with manual in situ measurements. Mean agreement scores (for a winter) were 0.85-0.91 for traditional grain size, 0.74-0.75 for optical grain size, 0.65-0.80 for density, and 0.71-0.83 for temperature. Grain sizes modeled with SNOW-PACK were compared to effective grain size retrieved from tower-based microwave radiometer measurements. The bias and RMS error of SNOWPACK optical grain size were -0.03 mm and 0.20 mm, respectively, and those of SNOWPACK traditional grain size were 0.30 mm and 0.33 mm, respectively. SNOWPACK snow profiles were used as input to the HUT snow emission model for calculation of TB, which was compared to microwave radiometer measurements. TB calculated with SNOWPACK optical grain size exhibited lower biases (from -12.5 k to 16.2 K, depending on year and frequency) and RMS errors (from 33 K to 18.5 K) than TB calculated with SNOW-PACK traditional grain size (bias from -42.2 K to -9.9 K, RMS error from 12.0 K to 44.7 K). Grain sizes, temperature, and density modeled with SNOWPACK were used as a priori snow data in the retrieval of SWE from tower based microwave radiometer observations. The lowest overall bias and RMS error were reached when traditional grain size from SNOW-PACK was used, either directly with modelled snow density and temperature ( 33 mm and 58 mm, respectively) or with an effective grain size correction and static snow density and temperature applied (22 mm and 59 mm, respectively). (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Sensitivity of modeled snow grain size retrievals to solar geometry, snow particle asphericity, and snowpack impurities
    Fair, Zachary
    Flanner, Mark
    Schneider, Adam
    Skiles, S. McKenzie
    CRYOSPHERE, 2022, 16 (09): : 3801 - 3814
  • [2] Improving snow depth estimation by coupling HUT-optimized effective snow grain size parameters with the random forest approach
    Yang, J. W.
    Jiang, L. M.
    Lemmetyinen, J.
    Pan, J. M.
    Luojus, K.
    Takala, M.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 264
  • [3] Improving snow depth estimation by coupling HUT-optimized effective snow grain size parameters with the random forest approach
    Yang, J.W.
    Jiang, L.M.
    Lemmetyinen, J.
    Pan, J.M.
    Luojus, K.
    Takala, M.
    Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 264
  • [4] Simulating seasonally and spatially varying snow cover brightness temperature using HUT snow emission model and retrieval of a microwave effective grain size
    Lemmetyinen, Juha
    Derksen, Chris
    Toose, Peter
    Proksch, Martin
    Pulliainen, Jouni
    Kontu, Anna
    Rautiainen, Kimmo
    Seppanen, Jaakko
    Hallikainen, Martti
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 156 : 71 - 95
  • [5] Estimation of snow depth in the UK using the HUT snow emission model
    Department of Meteorology, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad-44000, Pakistan
    不详
    Int. J. Remote Sens., 14 (4249-4267):
  • [6] Estimation of snow depth in the UK using the HUT snow emission model
    Butt, M. J.
    Kelly, R. E. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 29 (14) : 4249 - 4267
  • [7] EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION ACTIVITIES OF HUT SNOW EMISSION MODEL= \
    Lemmetyinen, Juha
    Kontu, Anna
    Qiu, Yubao
    Pulliainen, Jouni
    Hallikainen, Martti
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1122 - +
  • [8] Coupling the snow thermodynamic model SNOWPACK with the microwave emission model of layered snowpacks for subarctic and arctic snow water equivalent retrievals
    Langlois, A.
    Royer, A.
    Derksen, C.
    Montpetit, B.
    Dupont, F.
    Goita, K.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [9] HUT snow emission model and its applicability to snow water equivalent retrieval
    Pulliainen, JT
    Grandell, J
    Hallikainen, MT
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (03): : 1378 - 1390
  • [10] Parameterization of snowpack grain size for global satellite microwave estimates of snow depth
    Kelly, REJ
    Chang, ATC
    Tsang, L
    Chen, CT
    IGARSS 2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM AND 24TH CANADIAN SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING, VOLS I-VI, PROCEEDINGS: REMOTE SENSING: INTEGRATING OUR VIEW OF THE PLANET, 2002, : 686 - 688